Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us


Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.

See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Southern Farm Interests Prevail Again

POSTED: 02:27 PM ET, 12/13/2007 by The Editors

Southern farm interests flexed their political muscle in the Senate today, blocking an attempt to slash limits on what one farm family can collect in federal subsidies from $360,000 to $250,000 a year. It was the second defeat this week for lawmakers seeking to reshape the nation's farm programs, which contain billions of dollars in waste and loopholes, as a Post series has documented.

In today's action, a farm bill amendment drafted by Sens. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) garnered 56 votes, four shy of the 60 needed under Senate rules. The change was opposed by a solid bloc of Southern lawmakers, who claimed it would hit mainly rice and cotton growers left out of the ethanol-driven boom in the corn belt. "Farmers growing corn are making boatloads of money." said rice-state Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.).

Grassley and Dorgan were more successful during the last farm bill debate in 2002, when their amendment passed the Senate with 66 votes. It was cut out of the final bill, however, when House and Senate negotiators got together.

Today's vote suggests fading appeal for the payment limit issue even in populist-oriented Northern wheat states. Opposing the amendment were Sens. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Pat Roberts (R-Kan.)

All four Democratic senators competing in the Iowa primary -- Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y), Barack Obama (D-Ill.), Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and Joseph Biden (D-Delaware) -- voted for tighter limits. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was absent.

Update: Later in the day, farm state opponents blocked an amendment that would have prevented farm subsidies to individuals with adjusted gross incomes over $750,000.

-- Dan Morgan

By The Editors |  December 13, 2007; 2:27 PM ET Harvesting Cash
Previous: Charities Shortchange Veterans | Next: The Baseball Scandal


Please email us to report offensive comments.

Take down the names of the senators who fought against decreasing subsidies and vote them out of office. We have a huge debt to pay off, we can't afford these senators and representatives

Posted by: Toni | December 14, 2007 4:14 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining


© 2010 The Washington Post Company