Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us


Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.

See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Tax Break

POSTED: 05:00 PM ET, 02/29/2008 by The Editors

USA Today reports that Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton both have helped enact narrowly crafted tax breaks designed to benefit campaign contributors. The Democratic presidential candidates pushed through the tariff relief provisions despite promises on the campaign trail that they would work to limit the influence of Washington lobbyists.

Such obscure trade legislation, known as tariff suspensions, was the subject of a Washington Post investigation published in 2006. The project revealed that each year members of Congress quietly introduced hundreds of the little-known trade bills. The legislation had proliferated without public notice, delivering the breaks to favored corporations whose names appeared nowhere in the bills. The Post's calculations showed that in 2006 alone, Congress introduced more than 1,400 bills seeking tariff suspensions -- a record number that cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue. The analysis showed that the vast majority of the bills benefited large foreign firms, such as Bayer AG.

After the Post's article, the U.S. House and the Senate voted overwhelmingly to enact reforms. Lawmakers are now barred from personally profiting from the suspensions. Members of Congress must disclose all tariff suspensions slipped into unrelated bills. They must justify the tax breaks in writing and identify which corporations will profit and by how much. And lawmakers are barred from trading suspensions for other members' votes.

USA Today's story, by reporter Ken Dilanian, said Obama's campaign had accepted $54,350 from members of a law firm that in 2006 convinced Obama to introduce a tax provision benefiting a Japanese drug company. In 2002, the article said, Clinton introduced legislation at the request of Rienzi & Sons, a Queens, N.Y., food importer. The bill required the government to refund tens of thousands of dollars in duty charged on imported tomato products.
-- Joe Stephens

By The Editors |  February 29, 2008; 5:00 PM ET
Previous: Sticker Shock | Next: More FBI Abuses of National Security Letters


Please email us to report offensive comments.

"The bill required the government to refund tens of thousands of dollars in duty charged on imported tomato products.

Now I understand what these candidates mean about being agents of change. "Ca-ching, here's tens of thousand dollars in change, sirs. Btw, could you spare a dime for a poor presidential candidate?"

Posted by: Patrick Huss | March 3, 2008 11:13 AM

I will not pay my income taxes ever again

Posted by: Frank Rizzo | March 13, 2008 11:29 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining


© 2010 The Washington Post Company