Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us

Categories

Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.


Archives
See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Other
Investigations
Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Watchdogs: The Coast Guard's Accidents Investigations, or Lack Thereof

POSTED: 08:01 AM ET, 05/28/2008 by Derek Kravitz


"Washington Watchdogs," a periodic feature of the Post's Investigations blog, looks at the findings of the federal government's official investigators.

The U.S. Coast Guard didn't fully investigate hundreds of sea accidents and deaths because of inexperienced marine investigators, says an inspector general's report from the Department of Homeland Security.

The IG's investigators said they found 134 marine casualties that the Coast Guard failed to properly handle between Jan. 1, 2003 and Oct. 31, 2006.

The 51-page report has drawn the ire of Coast Guard officials who insist several of the accidents, and their possible causes, were investigated thoroughly.

U.S. Coast Guard Rear Adm. James Watson said 79 of those 134 cases were investigated at the right level and that investigators simply didn't update the Coast Guard's database correctly.

"The investigators just looked at the database without reading the actual reports," said Watson, who is director of the Coast Guard's Prevention Policy for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship. "We don't agree with the conclusions."

Despite the disagreement, Coast Guard officials said they agreed with the report's recommendations, including the improved training of Coast Guard investigators.

"Our review of the remaining cases investigated at the data collection level shows that the level of investigation was generally proper for the casualty circumstances, with eight cases downgraded without an identifiable reason," Watson said during testimony earlier this month before the House Subcommittee on Border, Maritime and Global Counterterrorism. "While we have concurred with the DHS OIG's recommendations in this area and will strive for constant improvement, we do not agree that the picture is as bleak as painted by the DHS OIG."

One notable example outlined in the report was the case of the shipping vessel Atlanta, which was returning to a New Bedford, Mass., port in December 2003 with about 9,000 pounds of scallop meat packed on board.

The load was much too heavy for the 65-foot boat and as a dredge full of scallops was brought close to the deck, the boat began to tilt.

The vessel's captain, 33-year-old Francisco J. Pereira, panicked, crewmates said. He mistakenly grabbed the wrong lever to pull the dredge aboard, causing the titling boat to tilt even more and take on water. Then the boat rolled.

At about 9:45 p.m. Dec. 13, 2003, the Atlanta sunk about 25 miles south of Chatham, Mass., with seven crewmen on board.

The bodies of Pereira and 45-year-old Kenneth D. Toolis, who had been sleeping below deck, were soon found floating in the frigid waters. Another man who fell in the water and went missing, 36-year-old Stephen M. Viator, was presumed dead. Four other men survived.

A report, obtained by "Washington Watchdogs" as part of a Freedom of Information Act request, indicated a number of potential causes for the Atlanta's sinking:

-- Two "dime bags" of marijuana were found in sweat pants that Pereira, the captain, was wearing and other crew members refused to take drug tests after the accident. Investigators believe drug use may have played a part in the Pereira's handling of the boat.

-- The large pile of scallops and debris on the boat's deck measured seven to 10 feet high, crew members said, and the boat had existing stability concerns.

-- Most of the ship's crew were relatively new to the Atlanta and Pereira was said to have lacked the "necessary experience" to operate the boat. Survival suits were also hard to locate on the boat and all of the surviving crew said they had no fire or life-saving training aboard the Atlanta.

But despite the seriousness of the accident, the investigative report on the Atlanta wreck was filed as a "data collection" level incident, which does not require investigators to determine what caused the accident. As a result, the Coast Guard issued no actions or safety alerts.

Watson said the investigative report on the Atlanta accident, which totals more than 200 pages, is exhaustive and contains several possible scenarios for what happened, which is in line with informal review policies.

-- Derek Kravitz

By Derek Kravitz |  May 28, 2008; 8:01 AM ET Washington Watchdogs
Previous: Paul's Campaign A Family Affair | Next: McClellan on Cheney

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Look into the Coast Guard's case of Department of Homeland Security/ US Coast Guard vs. Eric Shine and se if you can obtain the more then 4,000 to 5,000 pages involving this case - one that the Coast Guard does not want people to know about.....

Case number CG S & r 03-0166
And CG Enforcement activity 1671475

Then you will understand the gravity of what is really going on behind the scenes.

Additionally, the recent DHS OIG report was REDACTED HEAVILY by Richard Johnson's boss Anne Richards and the report was much more scathing then what was released....

Out of 16 recommendations only 8 made it into the report and only to make the Coast Guard look like it was pro-active and in compliance somehow with a fraction of the actual initial report.....

More revisionism by this Administration...

Posted by: Anonymous | May 29, 2008 6:39 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company