Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us

Categories

Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.


Archives
See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Other
Investigations
Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Lockheed Martin Failing to Maintain Weapons Program, Audit Says

POSTED: 01:57 PM ET, 06/ 3/2008 by Derek Kravitz


"Washington Watchdogs," a periodic feature of the Post's Investigations blog, looks at the findings of the federal government's official investigators.

Lockheed Martin, the world's largest defense contractor, has failed to properly plan for and control a multibillion weapons program, a leaked government audit shows.

The November 2007 Pentagon report, obtained by the Project on Government Accountability ahead of this morning's Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, says that Lockheed Martin's Fort Worth-based military aircraft division is not following appropriate oversight and industry guidelines for the company's F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, F-22 Raptor and F-16 programs.

The Defense Contract Management Agency found during an August review that the company's military aircraft division was found to be "non-compliant" in 19 of 32 industry guidelines, due in part to lack of planning. The report also deemed Lockheed Martin's attention to meeting certain guidelines "superficial at best."

The scathing report and today's Senate hearing comes after the April release of a 205-page report from the Government Accountability Office that said dozens of the Pentagon's biggest weapons systems, such as ships, aircraft and satellite projects, are billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule.

That report found that the Pentagon has doubled the amount it has committed to new systems, from $790 billion in 2000 to $1.6 trillion last year.

The report found about $295 billion in cost overruns in 95 Department of Defense programs.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said during today's testimony that efforts to better gauge how much defense projects will cost have fallen "far, far short."

"These contractors and program offices have every reason to produce optimistic cost estimates and unrealistic performance expectations, because programs that promise revolutionary change and project lower costs are more likely to be approved and funded by senior administration officials and by Congress," Levin said.

John J. Young, the newly minted under secretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, defended Defense planning and oversight, saying that cost overruns have not sent government defense contracting "on a downward spiral," but rather helped improve existing programs while making for a "catchy headline in the newspapers."

"Has there been cost growth in some DoD programs? Yes, and I am not here to condone it," Young said. "Indeed, I am seeking to strictly limit cost growth."

Katherine V. Schinasi, managing director of GAO's acquisition and sourcing management program, cited numbers that show investment in weapons acquisition programs is at its highest level in two decades and that most programs are delayed, on average, by about two years.

"It is clear that DoD's implied definition of success is to attract funds for new programs and to keep funds for ongoing programs, no matter what the impact," said Schinasi, who referred to the environment surrounding some defense programs as a "conspiracy of hope."

By Derek Kravitz |  June 3, 2008; 1:57 PM ET
Previous: NASA Press Office Distorted Findings | Next: New Canadian Theory On Leaked Obama Memo

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



I have to agree with Carl Levin statement. I was involved with the development of Pert Cost, Instruction 5000.2, Cost/Schedule Control Sysytem and the SAR Systems during my tenture in office of the Comptroller DOD. In addition, I peformed a study for the Army answering the question "When did we first identify that the program would be in overrun status?" A shocking answer!
Question: Does congress really want to know the cost of the weapon system or are they only interested in knowning and approving the cost for the hole in the water of the Aircraft Carrier? The answer is that they do not want to know the REAL cost of the weapon system but will only budget for the "hole in the water". I will stop here as the overall story is too long to print at this time. The story has to continue on to the Commision on government procurement and its recommendations to Congress.

Posted by: Bernard Tabarini | June 5, 2008 9:07 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company