Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us


Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.

See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Executive Privilege and the Fired Attorneys

POSTED: 04:40 PM ET, 07/31/2008 by Derek Kravitz

It has been a year and a half since seven U.S. attorneys around the country were fired on the same day. That action by the Justice Department sparked the Bush administration's most enduring political and legal battle with Democrats in Congress. Evidence continues to accumulate that senior White House and Justice Department aides targeted prosecutors and others in the department for removal based in part on their perceived loyalty to the administration and the GOP.

Today a federal judge dealt the administration a setback in its argument that details about the firings are protected from disclosure by executive privilege and need not be shared with Congress. The ruling said that former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers is legally required to appear before the House Judiciary Committee, The Post's Del Quentin Wilber reports.

The White House had argued that Miers and Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten were shielded from appearing or providing documents to the committee by "absolute immunity under the legal doctrine of executive privilege."

Today's ruling follows yesterday's contempt vote against former top White House aide Karl Rove for failing to appear at a July 10 hearing over allegations of undue federal influence over the Justice Department, including whether he encouraged prosecutions against Democrats such as former Alabama governor Don Siegelman, The Associated Press reports. The House Judiciary Committee voted along party lines to cite Rove for contempt of Congress.

The administration's troubles on the U.S. attorney front have been multiplying. Last month, Carrie Johnson of The Post quoted people familiar with the investigation as saying that a grand jury is examining possible discrepancies in testimony last year by former Justice Department civil rights division chief Bradley J. Schlozman, who acknowledged that he bragged about recruiting people who shared his conservative views for his unit.

Today The New York Times' Charlie Savage reported on little-noticed passage of a Justice Department report released Monday about politicization in the department's hiring of civil-service prosecutors and immigration officials: A 2005 e-mail from the White House's political affairs office to agencies throughout the executive branch directing them to find jobs for 108 people on a list of "priority candidates" who had "loyally served the president."

"We simply want to place as many of our Bush loyalists as possible," the White House emphasized in a follow-up message.

By Derek Kravitz |  July 31, 2008; 4:40 PM ET
Previous: The Fallout from the Stevens Indictment | Next: Picks of the Week: Anthrax; Diploma Mill; Ex-Con Brokers


Please email us to report offensive comments.

Test Comment

Posted by: Test | July 31, 2008 7:45 PM

Comments don't seem to be posting.

Build error in template 'Comment Preview Template': Error in tag: Can't find included template module 'wpnitop'

Posted by: Comments aren't posting | July 31, 2008 7:47 PM

aren't these the same GOP people who went after Clinton on ,first a land deal,and found nothing wrong,so kept spending taxpayer monies until they tried to impeach for what they were all doing,except,as one congressman said,"we are not the president,so what?"and blared from hill and dale that NO PERSON is ABOVE the LAw?But,now,somehow,it is different when they are caught?

Posted by: Pinkydink53 | August 1, 2008 5:58 AM

How can it be that one president can be hauled on the carpet for lying about a sexual encounter,but another is strictly "Hands Off" for lying and the death of innocent thousands?

Posted by: Emmett54 | August 1, 2008 6:49 AM

well if miers is really so stupid to believe that the law doesn't apply to her must believe she is working for bush/cheney to
think she can get away with that...

hey wait a minute...

she did work for them low-lying pieces-o-crap...

guess she'll get away with it...

btw...if there is anyone within the adminstation who really wants to get away with felonies and just good ole fashioned
law breakin?

have bush hire you real quick...

oh yeah, have alot of offshore bank accounts too...

i think belgium is the place to go now...

Posted by: hemnebob | August 1, 2008 8:53 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining


© 2010 The Washington Post Company