Report: More Favoritism at Justice
An inspector general's report accusing two Justice Department officials of using political litmus tests on candidates for jobs as immigration judges and line prosecutors is the second of four planned dissections of hiring decisions at Justice during the Bush administration.
A separate report, released in June, found that a pair of former high-ranking political appointees had violated department policy and the Civil Service Reform Act by using ideological reasons to scuttle the candidacy of lawyers who applied to the elite honors and summer intern programs.
Reports on hiring problems in the Civil Rights Division and the firing of nine U.S. attorneys have yet to be released, The Post's Carrie Johnson reports.
The report on the firing of U.S. attorneys was a central issue in the resignation of former Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales.
Gonzales repeatedly angered lawmakers by saying that he could not recall key episodes and details related to the U.S. attorneys' dismissals, testifying nearly 70 times at one hearing alone that he could not remember specific events.
By Derek Kravitz |
July 28, 2008; 1:01 PM ET
Previous: D.C. Jail Guards Have Arrest Records |
Next: Air Force Shakeup Continues with New Resignation
Posted by: Pablo | July 28, 2008 2:04 PM
Oh my God! Another President with a Monica problem.
Posted by: David D | July 28, 2008 11:44 PM
wait until Bush and his boss cheney are out of office,and then we will see some partial truths of what they have done to the American justice system.Some will never come out as it will destroy American people's confidence completely in the system.I figured we were in trouble when Bush appointed Ashcroft who has been defeated for the senate by a candidate who DIED a month before the elections.
Posted by: pinkydink53 | August 1, 2008 6:16 AM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
Just one question. When do we review EVERY appointee under Bush and Company's disasterous 8 year reign. If you don't know already that everything this administration did was politically motivated then you are naive or not paying attention.