Experts Predict Election Day Mess
It's been eight years since the disaster of the deadlocked 2000 presidential election, which ended up before the Supreme Court. And it's been six years since Congress tried to prevent a repeat by passing the Help America Vote Act.
But election experts across the country say that, despite $3 billion in federal spending to solve the problems, they still expect Nov. 4 to bring any number of headaches, from long lines to equipment malfunctions.
The Post's Mary Pat Flaherty reports that the huge turnout expected could strain election operations, which have been in a constant state of flux as jurisdictions have introduced new machines and procedures in recent years.
Touchscreen machines have fallen into disfavor, and now more than half of the nation's voters will cast a paper ballot that will be read by an optical scanner. That creates a paper trail, which can act as a back-up if there are questions about the final tally.
Millions of voters, many of them in battleground states, will be using machines that are different from those used four years ago. Also, a series of recent legislative debates and court rulings could leave poll workers confused about what identification is required of voters.
In 31 states, this will be the first presidential election using new statewide registration databases. When voters arrive at the polls, their information must match that list, which could lead to problems in places where the rules on what constitutes a match are particularly rigid.
"The voting process is going to be tested in a way it has not been in recent history," said Tova Wang, president for research at Common Cause, a government watchdog group.
By The Editors |
September 18, 2008; 10:53 AM ET
Previous: Interior Dept. Hearing, Palin's E-Mails, FEMA's No-Ice Rule |
Next: Interior: Losses 'Probable' at Oil Office
Posted by: Tom T. | September 18, 2008 11:48 AM
No long lines in Oregon. Mail in ballots work great.
Posted by: Maggie P | September 18, 2008 4:26 PM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
Arlington's voting lines regularly back up for a long time at presidential elections. One year I waited more than two hours. Maybe this post is a sign that the Post might actually report on these delays for once.