Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us

Categories

Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.


Archives
See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Other
Investigations
Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Scandal-Plagued Oil Agency Revamping Itself

POSTED: 06:41 PM ET, 10/20/2008 by Derek Kravitz

The federal office in charge of collecting billions of dollars per year in oil and natural gas royalties is in the midst of a massive reorganization after a highly-publicized sex-and-gift scandal this summer, officials said today.

A two-year investigation by Department of Interior's inspector general, Earl E. Devaney, into the oil-royalties program surfaced last month, finding a "culture of substance abuse and promiscuity" where officials in Colorado attended parties with oil and gas marketers, accepted gifts including ski trips, sports tickets and golf outings and steered contracts to favored clients. Two retired employees-turned-consultants pleaded guilty to federal conflict-of-interest charges and await sentencing.

Since then, several of the employees identified in the reports have been placed on administrative leave or transferred out of the Minerals Management Service's royalty-in-kind program, while officials contemplate a "full range" of options, including firing, said Gregory J. Gould, the newly-promoted associate director of the government's Minerals Revenue Management agency.

A week after the reports were made public, at a Sept. 19 town-hall meeting among oil agency employees in Denver, officials pledged they would take a "hard look" at the royalty-in-kind program and promised its first management overhaul since 2000. Employees appeared "upset and concerned" about media reports regarding the agency and asked that the "proper controls" be instituted, Gould said.

Last week, Gould wrote to staffers, saying the royalty-in-kind program would now be overseen by the department's asset management program, incorporating the 10-year-old royalties program into other operations so it's not "just hanging out to the side."

"The program was started several years ago as a pilot and it only recently became fully functional, so now we want to better align with other parts of our organzation," Goud said in an interview.

The Minerals Management Service's royalty-in-kind program allows energy companies to pay the government in oil and gas, rather than cash. Last year, it raked in more than $4 billion in royalties.

Gould said that while the profitable division would be "streamlined," positions would not be cut. He said officials are proposing adding more auditors to oversee the program.

"It was unfortunate that a small group of people had to take the focus away from the 99 percent of employees who do the right thing every day," Gould said.

Gould said congressional staffers and Interior Department officials would be briefed on the changes in the coming months.

The move immediately sparked more questions from watchdog groups, who have lobbied for an outside agency to perform compliance reviews and audits of the troubled oil division.

"There needs to be an independent body looking at the agency because it shouldn't be overseeing itself," said Mandy Smithberger, a fellow with the Washington-based watchdog group Project on Government Oversight. "There's an incentive for MMS to actually lease these properties and there needs to be someone independent to really audit these things properly."

Auditors have frequently complained about inaccurate and incomplete accounting reports from the oil-royalty agency, saying that it has been difficult to gauge whether the program saves taxpayers money.

Devaney, the Interior Department's inspector general, told the House Natural Resources Committee in September that his investigators found it "impossible" to determine whether any money was misappropriated by the agency because accounting records were too disorganized to be audited..

By Derek Kravitz |  October 20, 2008; 6:41 PM ET
Previous: Feds Probe Risky Swaps Market | Next: Notable and Quotable From Stevens Trial

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



The U.S. Constitution requires that all presidential candidates be born on American soil. Where was Obama born? Oddly, the American people have not been shown any substantial proof of Obama's place of birth.

Thank you for trying to give your readers the facts.

Posted by: Karen Williams | October 21, 2008 7:11 AM

Ms Williams says that the Constitution requires "that all presidential candidates be born on American soil." It actually says that the "president" (it does not metion candidates) be "a natural born citizen" but it does not really say what this means.

What proof do you want of Obama's birth? There are copies of his birth certificate on the Internet. Do you want to go to Honolulu to inspect the original?

Oh, yes, what does your comment have to do with the story about the story above?

Posted by: John Curran | October 21, 2008 1:23 PM

Ms. Williams should be grateful that she is wrong in her assertion. Senator McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, which was not even an American possession, rather an area of another sovereign nation (Panama) occupied and administered by the US, and hence certainly NOT "American soil". However being the child of two American citizens, one a serving member of the Armed Forces at the time, Senator McCain is normally judged to meet the constitutional requirements.

Posted by: ed hackard | October 22, 2008 10:58 AM

Being from a military family all babies born from miltary family are american citizens

Posted by: sandy | October 22, 2008 12:13 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company