Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us


Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.

See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Court Rules Against Bush on Missing E-Mails

POSTED: 04:30 PM ET, 11/12/2008 by Chris Matthews

Two watchdog organizations scored a legal victory this week when a federal court denied a motion by the Bush administration to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the White House's failure to properly store and recover millions of e-mails.

The e-mails are thought to pertain to several controversial issues including the Iraq war, the Valerie Plame leak and the CIA's destruction of interrogation tapes.

The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the National Security Archive originally filed suit to gain access to a secret White House study documenting the loss of millions of e-mails from Bush's first three years in office.

The White House acknowledged the missing e-mails in response to the lawsuit, but refused to make them public. The controversy brought swift congressional scrutiny, with Henry Waxman (D.-Calif), Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, noting "serious questions" about the administration's lack of an electronic archiving system. In 2002, the Bush administration stopped using the electronic recording program used under President Bill Clinton, and failed to install a new system.

Throughout the controversy, the White House has largely been able to deflect demands by advocacy groups, according to Mother Jones.

Meredith Fuchs, general counsel for the National Security Archive, dismissed the White House's attempt to hold up the case, calling Monday's ruling a "tremendous victory." Fuchs also said the onus of retrieving the missing tapes will now likely fall on President-elect Barack Obama's administration.

Throughout his campaign, Obama indicated that his administration would be more transparent than his predecessor's. Watchdog groups have expressed hope that Obama will release the missing e-mails, as the Clinton Administration did after being sued over its handling of e-mail records.

Whatever Obama decides, fear persists that many of the missing e-mails may be lost forever.

"I have some great worries about what the record of this administration is going to harvest, because they have done everything they can to slow down and obstruct the Freedom of Information Act," presidential historian Douglas Brinkley told Mother Jones. "I'm afraid of the sanitization process that will occur, because they don't have a sense of historical integrity."

A copy of the memorandum opinion and order in CREW v. Executive Office of the President issued Monday in which D.C. District Court Judge Henry Kennedy upheld lawsuits brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the National Security Archive.

More Investigations Documents

By Chris Matthews |  November 12, 2008; 4:30 PM ET
Previous: Foley Speaks Out, Apologizes for Page Scandal | Next: The Swiss Banker and 'Toxic Waste'


Please email us to report offensive comments.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining


© 2010 The Washington Post Company