Obama Stops Short of Strict Ban on Lobbyists
As part of the "most open and transparent" presidential transition in history, President-elect Barack Obama will bar lobbyists with conflicts of interest from working to help install the Illinois Democrat in the White House, his team announced today.
The ethics rules, designed to prohibit lobyists from advising the transition team on issues they have worked on recently, were announced by the Obama transition team's co-chairman, John Podesta, during an afternoon press conference, The Fix's Chris Cillizza reports.
Still, the rules fall short of the tough talk Obama doled out regarding lobbyists on the campaign trail, including that lobbyists don't represent "real America."
During a speech last November in Spartanburg, S.C., Obama said: "I have done more to take on lobbyists than any other candidate in this race. I don't take a dime of their money, and when I am president, they won't find a job in my White House."
In this YouTube video, check out minute 14:26 for Obama's comment
The transition team will have an estimated $12 million budget and a staff of about 450 people, Bloomberg reports. Around $5.2 million will come from federal appropriations and the rest from private sources, Podesta said, but contributions will be limited to $5,000 and political action committee money won't be accepted. Obama's transition team has begun working in an office space in downtown Washington provided by the General Services Administration, The Hill reports.
The new ethics rules, while not a strict decree against lobbyists, will be a sign of things to come, according to The Wall Street Journal's Washington Wire: "There is not a blanket ban on federal lobbyists playing a role in the administration, Podesta said, but noted that there will be strict guidance on what role they can play."
There is some skepticism about Obama's K Street limits and his transition team's movements.
Jeanne Cummings of Politico said lobbyists received "mixed signals" from the Obama camp about whether they could get a job in his administration.
"Many were surprised to hear on the final weekend of the campaign that they actually can get a posting in the Obama White House," Cummings wrote. "They just won't get jobs related to an issue they advocated for on Capitol Hill."
John Walcott, McClatchy Co.'s Washington bureau chief, said Obama has exerted "extraordinary control" over news about his transition team, "as if they've signed a 'loyalty oath' of silence. It will be difficult for us to cover a man who made history. It's hard not to buy into his 'hope' theme; it'll be a challenge," he said.
By Derek Kravitz |
November 11, 2008; 5:35 PM ET
Previous: Another Resort Trip for AIG |
Next: Obama's Transition, Interrogation Battle, Cyberthieves Mine Corporate Data
Posted by: theodosia1 | November 11, 2008 6:21 PM
Why arent the Credit Card Companies allowed to costantly raise their interest rates. These companies even threaten a segmant of the population that if we do not go along with their conditions your credit card account will be discontinued.
Also, if a person who just acquired a credit card, owes no money, and is legally seperated, the credit card company will hold you liable for monies not
paid by seperated or divorced spouse and will not allow you to remove yourself from the account. This is blackmail!
Posted by: LOONYBIN2000 | November 11, 2008 6:57 PM
"We'll be watching." Predictably, the present administration as well as their followers are more keen to observe the actions of presumed enemies, while allowing their own bedfellows free reign to subvert our constitutional rights for eight years. Were you as intent on watching the 2000 transition team while they were already planning the invasion of Iraq?
Posted by: gspeas | November 11, 2008 7:08 PM
What a pleasure to see President-Elect Obama start working to keep his promises even before taking the oath of office! Let's be fair, Mr. Kravitz - candidate Obama spoke in generalities, and President-Elect Obama is already giving us the specifics. If these rules "fall short," it's not by much. As someone who takes business ethics seriously, I'm delighted with this first step.
Posted by: LaurenBloom | November 11, 2008 7:15 PM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
We'll be watching.