Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us

Categories

Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.


Archives
See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Other
Investigations
Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Report: Interior Office Meddled With Endangered Species Act

POSTED: 06:30 PM ET, 12/15/2008 by Derek Kravitz


"Washington Watchdogs," a periodic feature of the Post's Investigations blog, looks at the findings of the federal government's official investigators.

Political meddling at the Department of Interior into the designation of imperiled species and habitats was more widespread than previously thought, investigators found, according to a lengthy inspector general's report (PDF) released today.

The report focused on 20 questionable decisions made by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, finding that Julie A. MacDonald, former deputy assistant secretary for fish and wildlife and parks, had a hand in at least 13 of them. But the report also found that MacDonald, a senior Bush political appointee, had help from others at the agency who "enabled her behavior" and "aided and abetted" her.

MacDonald resigned under pressure in May 2007 after investigators found that she had tampered with scientific evidence, improperly removed species and habitats from the endangered-species list, and gave internal documents to oil industry lobbyists and property rights groups.

Seven rulings made by MacDonald under the 30-year-old Endangered Species Act were subsequently revised, including the placement of the white-tailed prairie dog and Preble's meadow jumping mouse, a threatened mammal that lives in Wyoming and Colorado, back on the list.

H. Dale Hall, the director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, has called the MacDonald episode a "blemish."

MacDonald's influence in the Fish and Wildlife office was so prevalent that one unnamed employee told investigators that MacDonald's decisions got their own name: "It became a verb for us -- getting MacDonalded," the employee said, according to the inspector's general report.

Investigators also noted that they found "an enormous policy void" regarding the Endangered Species Act, which MacDonald allegedly exploited.

The report placed blame on some senior managers MacDonald worked with for failing to institute specific guidelines regarding the placement of species on the endangered-species list. Jay Tutchton, general counsel for the Santa Fe-based Wildearth Guardians, a non-profit environmental group, said MacDonald was simply a "foot soldier" in an office that promoted a "culture of fear."

"Senior managers expressed a total lack of interest in protecting certain species and habitats," Tutchton said. "The takeway lesson is that you have to get senior management interested and excited about protecting species. You can't have a culture where people will be scared they'll get rebuked."

MacDonald said in an earlier interview that she saw her job as protecting "the public face of the Fish and Wildlife Service" by carefully scrutinizing listing documents that often seem vague or unsupported by evidence. She declined to be interviewed for the report. Spokespersons for Interior Department Secretary Dirk Kempthorne and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said they had yet to fully review the report.

"Where we have identified problems, we have gone back and revisited those decisions," said Chris Tollefson, a spokesman for Fish and Wildlife. "From our perspective, we're moving forward."

Sen. Nick J. Rahall (D-W.Va.), the chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, said the report painted a picture "of something akin to a secret society residing within the Interior Department that was colluding to undermine the protection of endangered wildlife and covering for one another's misdeeds."

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who requested the report, called on congressional leaders to "take immediate steps to make sure that Julie MacDonald's legacy can never be repeated."

"This report makes it crystal clear how one person's contempt for the public trust can infect an entire agency," Wyden said. "Ms. MacDonald's narrow focus on her own agenda not only endangered the Endangered Species Act, it opened the door for countless land-use decisions and developments that would have never otherwise been considered."

By Derek Kravitz |  December 15, 2008; 6:30 PM ET Washington Watchdogs
Previous: The Enduring Appeal of Ponzi Schemes | Next: Richardson Donor Investigated, Unraveling a Ponzi Scheme, Cheney Still Backs Waterboarding

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



There seems to be no part of the government that Bush/Cheaney did not rape and plunder for the profit of their "base". I doubt that they will ever realise how much damage they did to those they swore to protect and defend. It comes as no surprise that the ignorant would do their very best to undermine the science of those who have brain cells within their skulls rather than an excess of ego and hot air.

Posted by: anOPINIONATEDsob | December 15, 2008 9:19 PM

How did President Bush get away with appointments like this?

I remember President Bush appointing Philip Cooney as chief of staff for the Council on Environmental Quality.

What did Mr. Cooney do before serving in the federal government?

Why he was a lawyer and lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute of course.

Mr. Cooney resigned after it was found that he had altered government climate reports to downplay scientific consensus about climate change.

Mr. Cooney now works for ExxonMobil.

How remarkable our American "MSM" let President Bush get away with these republican disasters of appointments for years and years.

Posted by: republican_disaster | December 15, 2008 9:35 PM

Too bad this report is "redacted." It would sure be nice if, down the road, when the Obama Administration does its shuffle, the public knows which of MacDonald's enemies are now running the henhouse.
The simple fact is, there ARE people within the agencies that have a mission that does not include public service. They serve their own agenda.
Never mind that USFWS doesn't have "action" in its mission. It regulates other federal agencies that DO have action as part of their mission, yet there is no accountability or restraint. For example, CH designations might have major consequences economically and socially for not only the agencies, but the private sector, consequences far beyond any perceived benefit of the designation...say a million acres locked up to get ten more fish. At what point does cost/benefit enter the discussion? Often, it never does, which is just the way the enviros, and their faithful Congresscreatures, like it. Pathetic.
I feel sorry for Julie MacDonald. She was trying to be rational about some of these things, and got wrecked for it.

Posted by: daskinner | December 16, 2008 2:43 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company