Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us


Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.

See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Would The 'Car Czar' Be Too Political?

POSTED: 03:16 PM ET, 12/11/2008 by Derek Kravitz

As Senate Republicans threaten to derail plans for a $15 billion bailout of the country's automobile industry, some are wondering aloud if a proposed "car czar" for the ailing companies would be less of a regulator and more of a political lackey.

This morning, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) bluntly said the plan wasn't "tough enough" and said "a lot of struggling Americans are wondering where their bailout is," signaling his dislike for some of the watchdog provisions in the legislation.

One of the major sticking points in the bill is the amount of influence, or lack thereof, of the proposed car czar, the industry regulator who would essentially control the purse strings of the government bailout and who could force Detroit's Big Three automakers into bankruptcy.

The critics suggest that the czar would have little real authority over the companies and would be susceptible to influence by lawmakers.

"A bailout would invite all sorts of meddling by lawmakers to have the companies carry out their own sort of pet policies," said Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.), according to the Wall Street Journal.

Some Republicans, namely Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), spoke of bolstering the duties of the new "auto czar." But in the House debate, Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) derided the czar as an unneeded "bureaucratic" imposition on private business, according to Politico.

Meanwhile, Democrats have been lining up behind former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker as the nominee for car czar job, but the 81-year-old economic adviser to President-elect Barack Obama doesn't meet some of the Republicans' ideal qualifications for the role (namely that he isn't a bankruptcy judge).

But Volcker does have experience; As Fed chairman, Volcker was the lead principal government regulator in the Chrysler Corp. bailout of the late 1970s.

By Derek Kravitz |  December 11, 2008; 3:16 PM ET
Previous: 'Lady Macbeth' of the Blago Scandal | Next: Senate Kills Auto Bailout, Jackson Supporters Sought Cash for Blago, Senators Blame Rumsfeld for Detainee Abuse


Please email us to report offensive comments.

Watching the Republicans try to blame the auto maker's problems on the Unions instead of Management would be a joke, if wasn't so serious. Management decides what kind of cars to build and the unions build them GM and Chrysler management had the Unions build stupid gas guzzlers that no one wanted to buy. Why is Ford in better shape? It built more cars for the world market and was better managed. Same Union deals. Ford would like a line of credit, in case ... no bail-out.

Give a short term loan and throw the bad management out of there!

Posted by: thebobbob | December 11, 2008 4:33 PM

Let them go bankruptcy where a judge can call the shots.

Posted by: theodosia1 | December 11, 2008 4:39 PM

The UAW contract is blackmail of the auto industry. Retiree medical benefits are the principal culprit. The UAW must get realistic and give it up already. Even the Fed employees no longer get retiree medical benefits, depending on hire date.

The market determines the products and people wanted big SUV's. With gas prices at a 5 year low many people still want them.

I say let the auto industry reorganize without taxpayer money.

Posted by: AbolhassanBaniSadr | December 11, 2008 4:43 PM

The Car Czar is yet another public relations gimmick used by Congress to make it look like they are exercising due-diligence as they take care of one of their preferred constituencies. Given a choice between bankruptcy (which the Big-3 and the UAW have fraudulently attempted to characterize as a disaster scenario), one would think that they would take whatever Congress chooses to give them. However, since that's really not what's happening at all, they (like the banks) are negotiating the terms under which they will accept a bailout.

Translation, they are threatening Congress with near term public consequences, as well as longer term private consequences which they know would come out in the event of a bankruptcy. That's exactly why it's in the best interests of the public to let them go bankrupt, just as it would benefit us to see several more major financial institutions go belly-up as well. That's the only way we're going to clean out the perpetrators of the malfeasance which has created this problem in the first place, and it's the only way to force into the public eye the behind the scenes conspiracy between private financial interests and members of Congress.

Considering what is being done to our economy by Wall Street, the UAW, Big-3, and Congress: If it looks like a Duck, and it quacks like a Duck, it probably rhymes with a Duck.

Posted by: thomas777 | December 11, 2008 5:12 PM

Even if a bail out does occur it will not save these companies. People are losing there job's, not buying cars. What's the point in loaning a company money that can't sell there products. Perhaps it is better to let them reorganize under Chapter 11. At the same time the government can use this money to replace it's own fleet of car's. This way it will keep people working untill this crisis runs it's course and the tax payers are not just throwing money away.

Posted by: ashmike13 | December 12, 2008 12:31 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining


© 2010 The Washington Post Company