Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us

Categories

Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.


Archives
See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Other
Investigations
Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

How 9/11 Changed the Quest for Intelligence

POSTED: 02:51 PM ET, 01/14/2009 by Derek Kravitz

President Bush, right, and Florida Lt. Gov. Frank Brogan, left, observe a moment of silence Tuesday morning Sept. 11, 2001 in Sarasota, Fla., for victims of the terrorist attack at the World Trade Center in New York. (AP Photo / Chris O'Meara)

If there had been other attacks, large attacks, many attacks, quite frankly--and this doesn't speak well to the country-- probably these things wouldn't have been an issue, people would have accepted it and the dark side would have been okay.

Bob Woodward

After the Sept. 11 attacks, President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney "believed another attack was very likely imminent," says Barton Gellman, the author of the Cheney book, "Angler."

At the beginning, a fear of what could happen next permeated throughout Washington, Gellman says.

Bush and Cheney believed "that there were crucial things they didn't know and that something worse might be around the corner," he said.

Woodward, who authored four books on the Bush presidency, said Cheney became the "self-appointed examiner of worst-case scenarios."

Bush recalled the intensity of those days during his closing news conference Monday: "Do you remember what it was like right after Sept. 11 around here? People were saying, 'How come they didn't see it, how come they didn't connect the dots?' Do you remember what the environment was like in Washington? I do.

"When people were hauled up in front of Congress and members of Congress were asking questions about how come you didn't know this, that or the other ... and then we start putting policy in place -- legal policy in place to connect the dots, and all of a sudden people were saying, 'How come you're connecting the dots?' "

How far to go when gathering such intelligence has been a running controversy of the Bush presidency. Lawmakers, policy groups, government officials and activists battled over disclosures of harsh interrogation tactics that many called torture, wiretapping of domestic phone conversations and secret prisons to house suspected terrorists in Europe and elsewhere.

The Bush-Cheney Legacy
The Washington Post's key coverage of George W. Bush's presidency, plus, a roundtable discussion by the Post's Bob Woodward and Barton Gellman.

In November 2001, Bush drew fire from civil libertarians when he cited an "extraordinary emergency" in authorizing military trials for suspected international terrorists, bypassing the American criminal justice system entirely.

The presidential directive applied to non-U.S. citizens arrested in the United States or abroad and designated Bush as the arbiter of which terrorism suspects would be tried.

Bush said the tribunals were needed because "mass deaths, mass injuries and massive destruction of property" from future terrorism could "place at risk the continuity of the operations of the United States government." It is "not practicable," he said, to require the tribunals to abide by the "principles of law and the rules of evidence" that govern U.S. criminal prosecutions.

At the time, legal scholars called Bush's measure unusual, but not unprecedented.

In May 2004, pictures from an Army-run prison where Iraqi detainees were beaten and sexually abused were leaked, sparking condemnation around the world and a scramble by the Bush administration to assuage concerns among its allies.

"I shared a deep disgust that those prisoners were treated the way they were treated," Bush said of the scandal at Abu Ghraib.

That disclosure was followed by revelations in November 2005 that the CIA had used secret prisons in Eastern Europe and elsewhere as part of a covert system to interrogate top al-Qaeda captives.

Since Bush first ordered military tribunals, terror prosecutions and their effectiveness have been routinely challenged; the Supreme Court ruled the system unconstitutional in 2006.

But it wasn't until today that an administration official publicly acknowledged torture under the Bush's policies.

Susan J. Crawford, a retired judge and the convening authority of military commissions, said the U.S. government tortured Mohammed al-Qahtani, a Saudi national who allegedly planned to participate in the Sept. 11 attacks.

"His treatment met the legal definition of torture. And that's why I did not refer the case" for prosecution, she said.

President-elect Barack Obama has already announced his intentions to permanently close Guantanamo Bay, representing a sharp shift in policy from his predecessor.

About 250 detainees remain at Guantanamo Bay but it's unclear what's next for them; Denis McDonough, an Obama foreign policy adviser, said in November that transition team members were still debating "about where and how to try the detainees."

In the Post roundtable discussion, Woodward suggested that if there had been other terrorist attacks after Sept. 11, the debate on the use of torture in interrogations might have changed.

By Derek Kravitz |  January 14, 2009; 2:51 PM ET The Bush-Cheney Legacy
Previous: Official Cites Detainee Torture, New Bias Alleged at Justice Dept., Geithner Grilled on Taxes | Next: $20K Inaugural Tickets for Sale as Congress Debates Ban

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Thought this would be of interest.

Since September 2001 I have maintained a free and confidential "9/11 list-serv".

The "9/11 list-serv" distributes daily e-mails containing newspaper articles and other relevant information re: 9/11 issues of interest to 9/11 families, 9/11 organizations and interested individuals.

The 9/11 List-serv archives can be accessed at http://groups.google.com/group/911-list-serv

If you would like to 'subscribe' to this free news service - send an e-mail to amkorotkin@aol.com with the word "subscribe" in the subject box.

Arnie

Posted by: arnoldkorotkin | January 15, 2009 8:16 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company