The Fallout From 'India's Enron'

B. Ramalinga Raju
He's not Bernard Madoff, but B. Ramalinga Raju has some explaining of his own to do.
Raju, the founder of one of India's largest outsourcing companies, Satyam, revealed yesterday in an emotional, 4-1/2-page letter (copy) to investors that he basically made up accounting figures for his firm, to the tune of $1 billion.
He likened it "riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten." Every attempt to eliminate gaps in the balance sheet and fill the "fictitious assets with real ones" and "non-existent cash" failed, he said.
Investors are understandably upset and ready to take Satyam to court (although the International Herald-Tribune reports that investors are more inclined to go after the firm's "deep-pocketed" auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, instead of the "cash-strapped" Satyam.)
India's stock market is shuttered today for a public holiday but the New York Stock Exchange has stopped trading on Satyam's American depository receipts, Forbes reports, and several banks, including HSBC Investment Bank and Goldman Sachs, have suspended their coverage of the firm.
Indian officials are trying to reassure investors that everything will be fine but experts are holding little hope that Satyam will recover. Reuters reports that outsourcing rivals Tata Consultancy Services and Infosys Technologies "could pick up defecting Satyam clients."
And what of Raju?
The 53-year-old son of a southern Indian grape farmer, Raju is now being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the market regulator, according to The Associated Press.
But Raju said he personally has taken no money from the company. "Not one rupee," he wrote.
"I am now prepared to subject myself to the laws of the land and face the consequences thereof."
By Derek Kravitz |
January 8, 2009; 2:30 PM ET
Previous: College Sports, Inc. |
Next: Flushing Out Interior's Bathroom Spending
Posted by: hughes_168 | January 8, 2009 8:05 PM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
The guy should be locked up for good and debarred for life from being on the Board of any company directly or indirectly. If stern action is not taken, it would send a wrong signal to the rest of world that India is can not be trusted as a destination for critical partnerships in the global business ventures. Integrity & Corporate governance should never be compromised no matter how tempting it may be to cut corners & dupe investors. Such devious actions will always return to haunt the world and cause immense havoc.