Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us

Categories

Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.


Archives
See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Other
Investigations
Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Looking at Jack Valenti's FBI file

POSTED: 04:53 PM ET, 02/21/2009 by The Editors

By Joe Stephens
Washington Post staff writer

Jack Valenti's FBI file arrived at my desk in a plain brown box. Inside were 310 pages -- and one big surprise.

Valenti was a senior White House aide during President Lyndon B. Johnson's administration who went on to national fame as the president of the Motion Picture Association of America. I had no idea whether the bureau kept a file on Valenti when I requested it two years earlier, under the federal Freedom of Information Act. But, under the leadership of the late J. Edgar Hoover, the Federal Bureau of Investigation kept tabs on an astonishing number of individuals.

Some of those files were kept for good law enforcement reasons. Others provided information that helped Hoover maneuver behind the scenes to remain in his post for decades. Presidents came and went; Hoover stayed.

In Valenti's case, much of the dossier turned out to be mundane. Some pages were indecipherable due to the heavy redactions made by government censors. Among other things, censors had covered with white boxes the names of most private individuals whom they believed to still be alive.

Valenti's dossier contained the results of the standard background check conducted when Valenti went to work for Johnson in 1963. Nothing of much import was discovered.

But halfway through the pile of paper was something completely unexpected. The FBI had spent substantial amounts of time and effort trying to substantiate a tip that Valenti had what the files described as "an affair" with an unidentified man. The files also showed that the bureau was looking into the sexual orientation of others who worked in the White House.

That was perplexing on several levels. The FBI's own file described Valenti as a former ladies man who was, by the mid-1960s, happily married to Johnson's former secretary. And even after the FBI's investigation, there was absolutely no evidence to support the tip -- a tip that Valenti's friends today say they consider ludicrous on its face. And yet, Hoover and Johnson, perhaps the two most powerful men in the nation, spent substantial amounts of their time and taxpayer's money wrestling with the issue. And this was amid the Cold War, in the wake of a presidential assassination.

The FBI had removed the name of Valenti's friend from every memo in which he was mentioned. And, once again, the file gave no reason to believe there was any substance to the rumor. Ultimately, the investigation was dropped.

I contacted members of Valenti's family who, after discussion, asked that they not be mentioned or quoted in our article on the file. I told them we would respect their wishes. It was also clear that the existence of Hoover's dead-end investigation was no surprise to some of those close to Valenti.

Readers have written to tell us they thought the material in the file was important in a number of regards. Some said it adds another piece to the puzzle of Hoover, further illuminating his methods and those of his deputies. Others said it provides additional information about how Hoover and the president interacted. The tone of the communications between the men in the file makes them sound like allies in trying to find and expose any internal threats within the administration. Between the lines, though, once might infer a hint of menace in their interactions, as well.

Finally, the files provide a vivid reminder of the mindset towards homosexuals, real or imagined, in the Washington of the early 1960s. One reader offered this:

"It is really great to see a piece in the Post that looks back at what gays suffered in Washington, D.C. in the 60s. The story of the FBI harassment of gay men and gay organizations in Washington, D.C. has not been fully told.

"I would only have added one sentence, after your line that being found out in the 60's "could end a career". Homosexuals at the time were explicitly banned from any federal employment, prohibited from security clearances, and banned from any work at the State Department because they were thought to be incapable of open service, being subject to blackmail.

"The "Lavender Scare" at the State Department ended more careers and ruined many more lives than Hoover's Communist witch hunts of the time."

Take a look at a previously confidential FBI document, redactions and all.


By The Editors |  February 21, 2009; 4:53 PM ET Reporter's Notebook
Previous: Another Hill Staffer Caught In Abramoff Scandal: 'What? No Hot Dogs?' | Next: Missing Tour Bonuses, Break in the Levy Case and Hitch in Classifying Memos

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



OK - so who told the WaPost journalist, Joe Stephens - that he could not mention PBS's Bill Moyers name in this piece. Moyer's has been exposed here before in other slimey moments of his when he had power - before he started acting holier than others. And I guarantee you that 95% or more, of his regular viewers will never hear this story.

Imagine that a conservative journalist, or pundit, or radical (like Moyers indeed is) on the other side -- within days - most everyone would be familiar with the story - and it would thereafter follow him, or her, for the rest of their lives. Anytime they made the news, our national media would interject the horrid history of their past.

Posted by: forparity | February 22, 2009 7:10 PM

To forparity (as if you were): Please note that the document is addressed to Bill Moyers, he is neither the author nor is there any evidence he solicited the information. As for being holier than others, I don't know about that, but he is certainly more honorable than Robert Novak (who outs CIA agents at the wish of Dick Cheney) and Judith Miller, who carried Bush's and Cheney's water to start the war in Iraq.

Posted by: briefal | February 23, 2009 1:11 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company