New York Tries to Force Thain to Give Up Bonus Details
New York authorities are trying to force the former head of Merrill Lynch to provide details about $3.6 billion in year-end bonuses paid out to top executives just weeks before the firm announced it had lost billions more than it had previously projected.
John Thain, the ex-chief executive of Merrill Lynch, refused to disclose information to the New York attorney general's office during a deposition Thursday regarding individual bonus payments, citing advise from attorneys at Bank of America, which has merged with Merrill Lynch.
Thain's attorney, Andrew Levander, told prosecutors that he didn't want to have Thain "sued by the company for saying that he's violating someone's privacy," according to a transcript of the proceedings (partial transcript courtesy of MSNBC).
Thain also defended the payment of the bonuses, saying they were performance-based:
Bonuses were determined based upon the performance and the retention of people, and there is nothing that happened in the world or the economy that would make you say that those were not the right thing to do for the retention and the reward of the people who were performing.
Thain, 53, has been under scrutiny since New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo began a probe into the approval of the year-end bonuses at Merrill Lynch, the New York investment firm that merged with Bank of America on Jan. 1.
The bonuses were set Dec. 8. Two weeks after Merrill Lynch's merger, the firm reported a $15.3 billion fourth quarter loss, resulting in an unexpected $7 billion hit on Bank of America. Thain was soon fired by Bank of America chairman and chief executive Kenneth D. Lewis.
By Derek Kravitz |
February 23, 2009; 6:06 PM ET
Previous: Levy Detectives Ran New DNA Analysis |
Next: House to Vote on Ethics Probe, Nursing Home Information Stymied, Burris Back to Washington
Posted by: hemnebob | February 24, 2009 3:43 PM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
are you kidding me?
if we, the government, bails them out then
don't we own part of them and those records should become public?