Find Post Investigations On:
Facebook Scribd Twitter
Friendfeed RSS Google Reader
» About This Blog | Meet the Investigative Team | Subscribe
Ongoing Investigation

Top Secret America

The Post explores the top secret world the government created in response to the attacks of Sept. 11.

Ongoing Investigation

The Hidden Life of Guns

How guns move through American society, from store counter to crime scene.

Have a Tip?

Talk to Us

If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.
• E-mail Us

Categories

Post Investigations
In-depth investigative news
and multimedia from The Washington Post.
• Special Reports
• The Blog

Reporters' Notebook
An insider's guide to investigative news: reporters offer insights on their stories.

The Daily Read
A daily look at investigative news of note across the Web.

Top Picks
A weekly review of the best
in-depth and investigative reports from across the nation.

Hot Documents
Court filings, letters, audits and other documents of interest.

D.C. Region
Post coverage of investigative news in Maryland, Virginia and the District.

Washington Watchdogs
A periodic look into official government investigations.

Help! What Is RSS?
Find out how to follow Post Investigations in your favorite RSS reader.

Hot Comments

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
— Posted by denamom, Obama's Quandary...

Recent Posts
Bob Woodward

The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.


Archives
See what you missed, find what you're looking for.
Blog Archive »
Investigations Archive »

Have a Tip?
Send us information on ethics violations or abuses of power.
E-Mail Us »

Other
Investigations
Notable investigative projects from other news outlets.
On the Web »
Top Picks »

Report: Cheney 'Furious' that Bush Wouldn't Pardon Scooter Libby

POSTED: 12:37 PM ET, 02/17/2009 by Derek Kravitz

Former President George W. Bush refused to pardon former vice-presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby as he was set to leave office, despite a last-gasp plea by his No. 2, Dick Cheney.

Cheney "repeatedly pressed" Bush to pardon Libby, and was "furious" when the president refused, according to unnamed sources quoted by the New York Daily News.

"He went to the mat and came back and back and back at Bush," a source told the Daily News. "He was still trying the day before Obama was sworn in."

It was more than five years ago, in July 2003, when Libby confirmed for Matthew Cooper of Time magazine and disclosed to Judith Miller of The New York Times the classified fact that the wife of retired U.S. ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, who was known as Valerie Plame, "worked at the CIA," according to prosecutors.

Libby then spoke to FBI agents about what he said, allegedly lying under oath. Barton Gellman, The Washington Post reporter who penned a book on Cheney entitled "Angler," (Post series) wrote:

At least four people told reporters about Valerie Plame's CIA employment: Karl Rove, Ari Fleischer, Richard Armitage, and Scooter Libby. The first three told enough of the truth under oath, and soon enough, to avoid indictment. Libby, among the most cautious of men, did not. On October 14 and November 26, 2003, he crossed a point of no return. He lied to the FBI about what he knew, how he learned it, and what he told reporters.

Libby was formally charged in federal court in October 2005, resigned and convicted in March 2007 of four counts of perjury, obstruction of justice and lying to the FBI. He dropped his appeals a few months later, citing "personal costs," and was barred from practicing law in the District of Columbia in March 2008.

Libby's 30-month prison sentence was commuted by Bush but his conviction stood (Bush didn't rule out later pardoning Libby). At the time, Cheney said he agreed with Bush's actions: "I thought the president handled it right," he said during an interview with CBS Radio. "I supported his decision." Still, Libby's departure from the White House left a noticeable hole, Gellman wrote:

Libby's loss deprived Cheney of his most capable and experienced adviser, his regular stand-in and the overseer of meticulous preparations for nearly everything Cheney did in government. Colleagues said (David S.) Addington, who became chief of staff, was a match for Libby in bureaucratic combat but not in breadth of knowledge or managerial skill. Nor could Addington replace himself as the Bush administration's alpha lawyer.

By Derek Kravitz |  February 17, 2009; 12:37 PM ET The Bush-Cheney Legacy
Previous: Questions for Burris, West Va. Case Spotlights Judicial Elections, 'Clawing Back' Madoff Money | Next: 'Colorful' Houston Billionaire in Fraud Probe

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



What kind of "journalist" fails to understand Dick Cheney is looking at the defense strategy used by former murderer/dictator Pinochet? Mad...yes...Dick Cheney is certainly a madman; only not using the meaning related to emotions. Rather, he is bad. He feared Halliburton going down the tubes over Dresser liability....so he pushed an illegal war and his cronies (mis)managed terrorist surviallence: the same way Cheney & Co., ran the SEC, FEMA, FDA, etc.
Phony fronts, actually targeting Democrats & independents for legal action...allowing the cronies plot & steal to infinity.
I think of Hitler playing with dogs & kissing children: is mad the synonym of bad? 100,000 dead Iraqi people....for what?

Posted by: mikepiedmont | February 17, 2009 2:11 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company