U.S. to Drop Stevens Case; Watchdogs Press for Bailout Details; Obama's Escalating K Street War
See what else we're reading by subscribing to our GoogleReader feed, or following us on Twitter.
U.S. to Drop Stevens Case » Attorney General Eric Holder announced this morning that he is dropping all the charges against former senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who was convicted last year on corruption charges. Holder had reviewed the case because of charges of prosecutorial misconduct that were being examined by the federal judge presiding over the case. — Washington Post
Watchdogs Press for Bailout Details » The massive programs designed to rescue the nation's financial sector are operating without adequate oversight, with vague goals and limited disclosure of their details to the taxpayers who are paying for them, government watchdogs told a Senate panel Tuesday. — McClatchy
Obama's Escalating K Street War » An unlikely alliance of groups -- including one co-founded by President Obama's chief ethics adviser -- argue that the administration's stringent new rules on lobbyists will penalize those who play by the rules while doing nothing to curb the influence of large corporations and campaign donors. — Washington Post
Army Probes Disputed Deployments » Army medical commanders are investigating allegations that medically unfit soldiers were deployed to Iraq in recent months out of Fort Wainwright in Alaska. Soldiers said commanders tried -- sometimes successfully -- to deploy them before they completed medical tests for health problems, before they were able to undergo necessary surgeries or before they were able to recuperate from operations. — USA Today
A DOJ Split on D.C. Vote » Justice Department lawyers concluded in an unpublished opinion earlier this year that the historic D.C. voting rights bill pending in Congress is unconstitutional, according to sources briefed on the issue. But Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who supports the measure, ordered up a second opinion from other lawyers in his department and determined that the legislation would pass muster. — Washington Post
After the jump...
BEST OF THE REST
» Highlights from TARP Oversight Hearing (POGO)
» HHS Pick Sebelius Admits Tax Errors (WaPo)
» U.S. Plans Key Role In Naming GM Board (WaPo)
» PMA Group scandal dogs Speaker Pelosi (TheHill)
» Congress Demands Records of AIG 'Fly on the Wall' (TPM)
» Court ruling makes Coleman win unlikely (MPR)
» Surveillance towers planned for Detroit, Buffalo (AP)
» Exams of Injured Workers Fuel Mutual Mistrust (NYT)
» Court Declines to Reconsider Philip Morris Case (WaPo)
By Amanda Zamora |
April 1, 2009; 9:57 AM ET
The Daily Read
Previous: Are Bank Execs Next?; The Man Who Brought Down AIG; EPA to Monitor Schools' Air |
Next: Connecticut Joins Madoff Lawsuit Fray
Posted by: captainkona | April 1, 2009 11:53 AM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
That's unfortunate. But I see what's going on.
The Bush Justice Department, being idiots, screwed up the case so bad it became difficult to justify pursuit.
Now, all things considered.... we gained the Senate seat, exposed Stevens' true dishonest nature for the historical record, and perhaps found him useful as a bargaining chip. Perhaps.
As much as I like to see any dirty politician get what's coming to them,
I can live with this.