Lawyer Says Abramoff's Family Living 'Just Above Poverty Line'
By James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Attorneys for imprisoned former lobbyist Jack Abramoff said yesterday that his wife and five children are living "just above the poverty line" and he should be permitted to continue spending a tax refund of more than $500,000 to pay back his lawyers and creditors, as well as those who have helped his family make ends meet.
The filing by Abramoff's legal team came in response to move by the Justice Department last month to stop Abramoff from using the tax refund to pay his bills. The government lawyers told U.S. District Judge Ellen S. Huvelle that a previous court order required Abramoff to first make $23 million restitution to Indian tribes and others he has admitted defrauding.
Abramoff, who has been behind bars since 2006, received a $520,189 refund from the IRS on May 4 and has already spent a significant chunk of it to pay outstanding bills.
By Amanda Zamora |
June 3, 2009; 12:26 PM ET
Abramoff Scandal
Previous: DOJ Targets Tech Giants; Congress Helped Banks Defang Key Rule; A Shifting Earmark Eyed |
Next: McHugh's Defense Industry Ties








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.