Concern Over E-Mail Surveillance Grows; CIA Fights Full Release of Detainee Docs; White House Withholds Visitor Logs
Today's Daily Read powered by Publish2. See what else we're reading by subscribing to our GoogleReader feed, or following us on Twitter.
Concern over E-Mail Surveillance New York Times
The National Security Agency is facing renewed scrutiny over the extent of its domestic surveillance program, with critics in Congress saying its recent intercepts of the private telephone calls and e-mail messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged.
CIA Fights Full Release of Detainee Report Washington Post
The CIA is pushing the Obama administration to maintain the secrecy of significant portions of a comprehensive internal account of the agency's interrogation program.
White House Withholds Visitor Logs Washington Post
The Secret Service has rejected requests from two organizations for access to White House visitor logs, which document the West Wing meetings that have helped shape Obama administration policies. Advisers say they are reviewing the policy of keeping the records secret.
Testimony: VA Medical Gear Still Being Mishandled USA Today
Investigators with the inspector general's office at the VA testified that some VA facilities were not following procedures, months after it was discovered that improperly cleaned instruments may have exposed veterans to hepatitis and HIV.
Military Lawyers Can Still Defend Detainee AP
Text-message Fees under Antitrust Scrutiny LAT
White House Comments on I.G. Firing WaPo
Corruption Trial of Ex-Rep. Jefferson Begins WaPo
CBO: Obama's Health Plan Lacks Spending Controls WaPo
Former White House Counsel Testifies Fox News
Uighurs: U.S. Let Chinese Interrogate at Gitmo Huffington Post
Plea Bargain Offered in Detroit Bribery Probe Free Press
Federal Raids in Utah Criticized as 'Excessive' LAT
Chicago Hedge Fund Manager Indicted for Fraud Bloomberg
By Sarah Fitzpatrick |
June 17, 2009; 9:51 AM ET
The Daily Read
Previous: Gov. Audit Finds U.S. Overpaid Blackwater; IG Report: Regulators Failed Banks; CIA Mistaken on 'High-Value' Detainee, Document Shows |
Next: Insurance Fraud By N. Korea Outlined; U.S. Power Grid Scanned for Spies; DOJ Corruption Unit in Disarray
Posted by: TopGun4 | June 18, 2009 10:26 AM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.








If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

Unfortunately I believe that we are limited in what we can focus on. I think that if we proceed with the partisan sideshow of prosecuting Bush admin. officials, healthcare will get lost in the brouhaha.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
Re: Alec MacGillis's puff piece on John Edwards, so, the subject of the interview says I will not talk about topic A, B or C. Translation: I'm looking for free publicity to try to convince the audience I'm someone other than I truly am. This is the Wash Post's idea of reporting? If I remember right, the Wash Post also refused to investigate Edwards during his presidential campaign when rumors were rampant that Edwards was lying to the electorate about his affair, all while putting his wife front and center in his campaign. Just in case the Wash Post and its reporters are still delusional about their worth in this democracy, let me be clear. The Wash Post is nothing more than a national laughing stock with an elevated sense of importance. And by the way, if you want to contact me to discuss my comment, please know that I'm not willing to discuss this topic and instead will only talk about things that make me look good.