Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama's Big Muslim Test

Expectations are mounting for President Obama's big speech to the Muslim world from Cairo on Thursday -- and his approach is coming into clearer focus, as well.

Margaret Talev and Warren P. Strobel write for McClatchy Newspapers:

President Barack Obama has a sweeping goal for his speech Thursday in Cairo, Egypt: to begin remaking the dynamic between the United States and Muslims abroad.

He'll declare a clean break from the Bush administration's "war-on-terror" approach to foreign affairs and forcefully endorse establishing a Palestinian state.

He'll talk about his respect for Islamic culture and call for an era of partnering with Muslim nations in areas of common interest, among them curbing violent extremists before they destabilize Muslim nations and threaten the West.

Having publicly demanded that Israel stop building settlements in the predominantly Palestinian West Bank, he'll also ask Arab nations collectively to recognize Israel's existence.

Tim McGirk writes for Time:

Obama's Cairo speech is supposed to set a new course for U.S. policy in the turbulent Middle East; the key to its success is to promote the image that his Administration is taking a more evenhanded approach to the Arab-Israeli conflict than did his predecessor. But this has not gone down well with [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu's hawkish Cabinet, which is grumbling in the Israeli press that Obama has gone too far the other way, supposedly granting concessions to Palestinians that are "unfair" to Israelis.

Indeed, Helene Cooper writes in the New York Times:

As President Obama prepares to head to the Middle East this week, administration officials are debating how to toughen their stance against any expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

She also notes that Obama:

will begin the Middle East leg of the trip in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where he will take King Abdullah a wish list from not just himself, but from Israeli and Palestinian officials as well. Officials said Mr. Obama was hoping that King Abdullah would agree to make an overture to Israel that could, in turn, get Israel to move more quickly on a peace process.

Howard Fineman writes for Newsweek that:

George W. Bush set the bar so low... [a]ll Obama has to do to be a success is elicit applause—rather than a fusillade of hurled shoes.

But he has privately told friends that his goal is far higher: nothing less than to help "reconcile Islam and modernity." He will pay homage to the Golden Age of that culture — its glorious achievements in mathematics, science, literature and diplomacy—and note that Muslim scholars rescued from oblivion the Greek and Roman (i.e., the "Western") canon. He also will draw on the by-now-familiar story of his own life. A Christian son of an African-Muslim father, he spent years in Muslim-majority Indonesia, attending a public school run by, but not suffused with, the teachings of Islam. All of this, Obama thinks, not only allows him, but obliges him, to play a grand role as bridge builder....

In the diplomatic community, there is little doubt the president is doing the right thing in Cairo. "President Bush liked to talk about our shared values, but it came off as didactic," said Tamara Wittes of the Brookings Institution. "His escalating series of military interventions left people in Muslim-majority countries feeling imposed upon. Obama's speech is a game-changer, because he's going to say that we are partners and equals."

Nevertheless, Fineman warns of "risks, large and small." For instance, "that the incorrigibles in the neighborhood — the true terrorists — will see him as a naif and be emboldened by that thought." Also "that he will become a prisoner of his own words, and the high expectations they create."

Read my most recent Middle East items here.

By Dan Froomkin  |  June 1, 2009; 12:58 PM ET
Categories:  Middle East  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Still Playing the Race Card
Next: Watch Froomkin


Watch how Obama's middle name gets a lot more play from both sides, the filth screaming about it indicating a sellout and everyone else noting that it gives him a special bit of cred with the Muslim world.

That Obama is the first in decades to put actual pressure on Israel to do something about those effing settlers isn't lost on anyone.

Posted by: chrisfox8 | June 1, 2009 1:40 PM | Report abuse

Now that the Israelis have built their (illegally positioned) wall, preventing the Palestineans from using suicide bombers to attack Isralis, the only excuse that the Israelis have for inflicting terror on the Palestineans are their inaccurate home-make rockets. Suppose that someone arranges for the North Koreans to supply accurate missles/rockets to the Palestineans that could accurately hit any target in Israel from anywhere in the Palestinean territory, Lebanon, or even the Sinai. What would the Israelis do then? Kill all Palestineans or make peace?

Posted by: dickdata | June 1, 2009 1:40 PM | Report abuse

We're supposed to be grateful at Israel's magnanimous reluctance to slaughter the Palestinians wholesale. What a bunch of grand guys, refraining from killing more women and children than they already do on their helicopter joyrides.

Posted by: chrisfox8 | June 1, 2009 2:03 PM | Report abuse

Obama's Big Muslim Test = Test to Verify that Obama is a Big Muslim

Posted by: warrensmith73 | June 1, 2009 10:21 PM | Report abuse

chrisfox8...your comments are provocative and fail to present a balanced opinion and in context. israel seeks to leave in peace with its neighbors. unfortunately, few all willing to allow it to leave in peace and quiet. no one--even those countries who signed a peace treaty with israel (this is especially the case with egypt--see the behavior of the education minister who vowed to burn all israeli books he found in bookstores and libraries). anyway...

obama has his work cut out for him. referring to its 'golden age' won't bring the islamic/muslim/arab world to easily or happily into the "modern world." it's an issue the arab and islamic world has been struggling with for the last 300 years. a lot of its anger at the west is a product of its sense of being trapped in the past (glory lost). the political culture/reality of the arab world also seems to retard opening up the societies and countries. people power is dangerous to many, if not most, of the regimes in the islamic middle east.

this does not preclude seeking a better understanding and rapprochement between the different cultures. the pragmatic middle needs to be strongly supported to counteract the extremist jihadist tendencies in the region and world.

lastly, obama must use this opportunity to lay out his vision for a better world without cowtowing to the "arab oil line". terrorism and disrespect of other people (religions and ethnic groups) must be clearly condemned. peace requires a real commitment to mutual respect and compromise. the people (as opposed to the ruling elites) must be prepared for the projected upcoming changes. power elites must be encouraged to speak honestly with its people and to allow greater political openness and transparancy--democratic values. he needs to be an equal opportunity offender to encourage all to work together for positive change for all.

Posted by: dbear1 | June 2, 2009 6:13 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company