Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama Aces Super Bowl Prediction

In a sometimes serious but mostly lighthearted pre-Super Bowl interview with NBC's Matt Lauer yesterday (above), President Obama -- looking boyish and relaxed in an open-necked shirt and no jacket -- vowed that a "substantial" number of American troops will have come home from Iraq within a year, joked about his new BlackBerry ("It's like Inspector Gadget, if you touched it, it might blow up... It turns into a car, if I have to make a quick getaway") and correctly predicted the results of the big game ("I think the Steelers are gonna eke it out in a close one.")

Here's the transcript.

Lauer extended the president an opportunity to indulge in Bush-style fear tactics, but Obama gently declined:

Lauer: "There are millions, tens of millions of people watching this broadcast right now, Mr. President. If they were to have access to the same information you have now on a daily basis, how much less sleep would we all be getting?"

Obama: "Here’s what I think is important for everybody to understand. We’ve got real threats. And we have to remain vigilant. But the quality of our armed forces has never been better. When you meet the people who are charged with keeping America safe, it gives you enormous confidence. They are on the case day in and day out with extraordinary profess — professionalism. But there is no doubt that — we have to make sure that we don’t let up because there are people who would be willing to do us harm."

Obama described what he called "sobering moments" such as "having to sign letters for troops... who have died and — and sending letters to their family, where you realize every decision you make counts. And, you know, you don’t have time to — you — you don’t have time to spend a lot of time on inconsequential stuff. You’ve gotta focus on, at this point, putting people back to work but also reminding yourself that you’ve got hundreds of thousands of people — around the world who are putting themselves in harm’s way and you are the commander-in-chief."

Asked how important it is to gain some Republican support for his economic stimulus package, Obama replied: "Well, look, the — the important thing is getting the thing passed. And — I’ve done extraordinary outreach I think to Republicans because they had some good ideas. And I wanna make sure that those ideas are incorporated. I am confident that by the time we actually have the final package on the floor that we are gonna see substantial support."

On being shown how he was cut out of a photo of his family on the cover of US Weekly, Obama replied: "It's a little hurtful." When Lauer pointed out it was in favor of a photo of Jessica Simpson, Obama wryly took note of the headline above the picture, adding, "who's losing a weight battle, apparently."

Obama also spoke warmly of his mother-in-law -- and of being able to spend more time with his family: "At the end of the day, yeah, I can come home, even if I’ve got more work to do, I can have dinner with them. I can help them with their homework. I can tuck them in. If I’ve gotta go back to the office, I can. But — I’m seeing them now more than anytime in the last two years."

By Dan Froomkin  |  February 2, 2009; 9:34 AM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: The Comedian in Chief
Next: Bush Legacy Watch

Comments

Obama: "Here’s what I think is important for everybody to understand. We’ve got real threats. And we have to remain vigilant. But the quality of our armed forces has never been better. When you meet the people who are charged with keeping America safe, it gives you enormous confidence. They are on the case day in and day out with extraordinary profess — professionalism. But there is no doubt that — we have to make sure that we don’t let up because there are people who would be willing to do us harm."

This quote sounds like it coulda come from w. All that's missing is a "In other words..." i hope this isn't a signal that he will continue the horrid torture/rendition/detention policies of his predecessor. And when will someone ask him if he's gonna give a pass to w., Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Yoo, et al. And how he thinks that reflects on his administration. i'm a huge fan of Obama, but his inaction and silence on the past administration's war crimes is discouraging. Maybe it's a timing thing, though.

Posted by: nffcnnr | February 2, 2009 10:39 AM | Report abuse

So after years and years of Froomkin dumping (and that would be nice) all over Bush, it appears he has found a boyfriend in Obama. Nicey, nicey, kiss, kiss. Wow, and Froomkin thinks he is a legit op/ed type guy. He is such a joke.

Posted by: mmourges | February 2, 2009 11:01 AM | Report abuse

DF,

I like the new format, it is change I can believe in!

PS I edit judicial opinions for a living and always want to edit that slogan to "change in which we can believe!!"

Posted by: lawstudent922 | February 2, 2009 12:24 PM | Report abuse

"So after years and years of Froomkin dumping (and that would be nice) all over Bush, it appears he has found a boyfriend in Obama."

This is why the "liberal media" myth will persist long after we're all dead. Historical parallels and situational context are completely lost on these right wing nutters who prefer to see bias in everything they dare to explore beyond FOX News. Self-fulfilling prophecy, anyone?

Posted by: BigTunaTim | February 2, 2009 3:13 PM | Report abuse

I bet US mag would sell more copies with Obama there than pudgy Jessica....bad business decision.

Posted by: Digger2 | February 2, 2009 3:44 PM | Report abuse

To the first comment.... if there was to be anything done, it should have happened during the last two years under the Reid and Pelosi rule of Congress. Barrak going after W for trumped up "War Crimes," is just a bunch of bs, and he will be better off by not officially touching that subject.

Second... on this extraordinary outreach to republicans... he has been in office less than two weeks, and he has already chided the other party twice, according to published reports. House version of the bill, didn't include any of these ideas from Republicans, and apparently it disgruntled a few of their own rank-n-file. So... bipartisan support against the bill... but only partisan support for it.

Posted by: alutz08 | February 2, 2009 5:50 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company