Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Inside the Beltway, the Honeymoon is History

Well, it's official.

David von Drehle and Michael Scherer write for Time: "Barack Obama's honeymoon in the corridors of power has come to an abrupt end — even as opinion polls show that the public remains by his side. To most grownups, seven weeks is an eyeblink (in baseball it's called spring training), but along the Acela line it is much ... too ... long to wait for Obama to fix the economy. And so the doomsday chorus began: He's trying to do too much. He's doing too little. His bank bailout is too complicated. His health-care plan is hollow. The great orator can't communicate his priorities. His priorities are clear — but screwed up....

"The political strategy of the Administration can be summed up in a motto: 'Never waste a good crisis,' as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put it. That phrase has been the rallying cry of the Obama team for months. But it increasingly appears that the Administration was unprepared for both the severity of the recession and the political resistance to trying to do so much at once. And so the Obama team is coming to grips with another motto for the ages: Sometimes a crisis is an opportunity — but sometimes it's just a crisis...

"Inside the Administration, Obama's audacious budget sketch is seen as an intricate web of reinforcing reforms, an exquisite piece of re-engineering in which stimulus creates jobs, jobs generate revenues, revenues fund an efficient health-care system, which in turn tames the deficit. What critics consider a massive intervention to impose a price on carbon emissions is, to the White House, the engine for the growth of a robust new green economy. Meanwhile, students will begin graduating from improved schools and moving seamlessly into this prosperous future. Shortcomings may lie in the details, but the economy won't really be fixed until the entire web is assembled....

"The reason so many people were left slack-jawed by the Obama budget was not that they disagreed with his premise[s]...It was the real-world knowledge that financial calamity has not magically transformed our slow-moving, reform- resistant, cantankerous government into a peaceful, streamlined, problem-tackling machine. Every one of Obama's reforms will mean bigger political fights, consume more intellectual bandwidth and require more bravery from politicians than Washington has witnessed anytime in the past 15 years."

Alexander Bolton writes in The Hill: "Members of Congress and old political hands say he needs to show substantial progress reviving the economy soon.

"Some Democrats have started to worry that voters don’t and won’t understand the link between economic revival and Obama’s huge agenda, which includes saving the banking industry, ending home foreclosures, reforming healthcare and developing a national energy policy, among much else.

"While lawmakers debate controversial proposals contained in the new president’s debut budget — cutting farm subsidies, raising taxes on charitable contributions, etc. — there is a growing sense that time is running out faster than expected."

And Michael Hirsh writes for Newsweek about "the Blame Obama rhetoric that's been building in recent weeks. Even some who were the president's most fervent supporters on Inauguration Day are now saying plainly that, halfway through his first 100 days, Obama hasn't delivered on the biggest thing that he promised. He and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner pledged an overwhelming and powerful response to the crisis — an economic Powell doctrine that would restore confidence in the markets. Instead, we've had a hesitant if steady dribbling-out of new programs. What Obama has done is impressive in many ways, but it's hardly a New Deal."

But Hirsh also writes that the verdict may be a bit too quick. "Still, many of these criticisms will fade into irrelevance—along with the grim jokes about Geithner's imminent dismissal—if the banking problem starts to come around. We've got 50 more days to go—time enough for Obama to come out looking Rooseveltian yet."

By Dan Froomkin  |  March 12, 2009; 12:37 PM ET
Categories:  Obama v. D.C.  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Battling Over Freeman's Legacy
Next: Obama Mocks GOP Critics


We don't have "50 more days to go". There is no referee who can declare that "time is running out". We're talking about serious national problems using artificial timetables and sports metaphors.

The whole notion of looking back at the first 100 days of a Presidency is to take a breather after the election, let the President get his sea legs, and then *look back* after a sufficient interval has elapsed. This President was hardly given one day, let alone 100 days to set his agenda.

Posted by: fletc3her | March 12, 2009 1:56 PM | Report abuse

Well said....and the washington power brokers who have had their way for years are suddenly concerned that change has come....I for one think Obama has moved quickly to do as much as could be done in such a short time, repairing the damage of the last 8 years takes more than 8 minutes...or 50 days...and Congress needs to get on board with the changes that must happen if the country is to survive...

Posted by: constwkr | March 12, 2009 2:29 PM | Report abuse

This is the time that most dictators would suppress the press so they could get something done. Ah, the price of freedom...

Posted by: MHawke | March 12, 2009 2:32 PM | Report abuse

If we could just find a way to pull the plug on Rush....that would be priceless....

Posted by: constwkr | March 12, 2009 2:40 PM | Report abuse

"We've got fifty days left..."

That's so-o-o-oo Beltway! It's hard to keep from giggling, sometimes.

Posted by: fzdybel | March 12, 2009 2:44 PM | Report abuse

Definitely a crisis in Beltway punditry!

Posted by: smuhlberger | March 12, 2009 2:51 PM | Report abuse

Considering how wrong the Beltway usually is, one would be a fool to take their indulgent, self-aggrandizing proclamations, prognostications and catastrophizing seriously. Indeed, I don't think anyone OUTSIDE the Beltway does.

It's only in the Beltway that the proclamations of insulated (to speak euphemistically) journalists are considered important. Outside the Bubble, we're governed by something Beltway journalists should tap into more frequently: reality.

Posted by: associate20 | March 12, 2009 3:21 PM | Report abuse

The beltway pundits are as divorced from reality as Bush was. They really are a joke and it's pretty obvious to anyone who doesn't live in that world.

In my opinion we haven't really had a functioning Washington press corps in at least a decade and a half. They were a disgrace during the Clinton years more concerned with someone's dress and the beat the drums for impeachment until the Senators who actually know how to read polls put an end to it. They were an even bigger disgrace during the Bush years allowing him to run roughshod over everyone who opposed him, aiding and abetting the march to an ill considered war.

The Washington media has really been out of touch with the rest of America for many years. It's no wonder newspapers are going out of business left and right and people are tuning in to John Stewart.

The Press has failed us.

Posted by: troyd2009 | March 12, 2009 6:04 PM | Report abuse

Can these pinheads point to anything that has actually changed that indicates "the honeymoon is over"? Obama isn't getting any more criticism than before, and his approval from the general public isn't any lower. There was no honeymoon, and nothing has changed recently.

If you look back at the past five presidents, it's clear that only Republican presidents get honeymoons. Democrats respect the will of the people, and show some deference to the agenda of a newly-elected president, producing a honeymoon. Republicans don't respect anything but their own power, and what's best for regaining it, so they try to trash the president and his agenda right from the beginning, the people be damned. And the Beltway press aids and abets them, by pretending that "the honeymoon" is something that just happens, not something that they themselves are intimately involved in.


Posted by: jimeh | March 12, 2009 7:15 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company