Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
On Twitter: MrMichaelLee and PostSports  |  Facebook  |  E-mail alerts: Redskins and Sports  |  RSS

Wizards Staying Upbeat

Maybe these guys are resigned to their fate, now that they are 17-59, or the morale has been boosted with Gilbert Arenas and Brendan Haywood coming back. But I don't know if there is another a team that could lose three games in a row and continue to find things to laugh about.

Before the Washington Wizards lost 112-107 last night, Nick Young and Dominic McGuire were watching film of the Grizzlies' last game against Golden State when they saw Grizzlies forward and Baltimore native Rudy Gay make a sick, fastbreak dunk. Gay took off inside the dotted, foul line circle and cocked the ball back for an emphatic slam. Young rushed to the TV to find a remote so that he could watch a replay. Arenas said the dunk was okay but nothing special, so Young commenced to watching the replay about seven or eight more times.

The first few times, he was trying to convince Arenas that the dunk was impressive. Arenas sort of came around after Mike James and Antawn Jamison sided with Young. But then Young started getting carried away with the remote, replaying the dunk in slow motion and then pausing to capture every frame of Gay's flight to the rim.

Eventually Jamison got fed up, shouted some unprintables and said, "C'mon now, Nick. Why don't you make a highlight yourself?"

Young shot back, "I could if you guys would pass."

"Don't look at me. I only have the ball two seconds when I get it," Jamison.

"And it's going up," Young said.

"Maybe I would give you the ball if you stopped shooting with eight people on you," Jamison said.

"That's the only shot I can get," Young said.

The back and forth might've led to some salty attitudes when the players hit the floor, but guess who Jamison connected with for his first assist of the game? Young.

Jamison drove inside, leapt and turned to find Young open for a three-pointer in the second quarter.

And guess who had his own highlight moments later? Young.

With his fellow USC alum O.J. Mayo guarding him, Young juked Mayo, dribbled around him and dunked.

See, Young got what he wanted and Jamison got what he wanted. If only the Wizards had gotten what they wanted -- a win in Haywood's return.

Don't discount the affect that Arenas's return has had on team morale the past few weeks of the season. One player told me before the game that he thought Arenas coming back encouraged Haywood to come back. With the possibility that both Arenas and Haywood could play together before the season ends looking more like a reality, Jamison said, "It's getting better for us every day."

By Michael Lee  |  April 2, 2009; 8:35 AM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Grizzlies 112, Wizards 107
Next: The Other Side: Cleveland Cavaliers

Comments

sigh

Posted by: bryc3 | April 2, 2009 8:52 AM | Report abuse

sigh indeed.

Posted by: glawrence007 | April 2, 2009 8:56 AM | Report abuse

Man, it sure was nice seeing Haywood out there last night. I have always been a Haywood supporter since day 1, and yesterday only showed me more how much we really missed that dude playing defense in the block.

Is he D. "Superman" Howard manning the middle? No. Were they playing the Cav's or the Lakers last night? No. But the point I am trying to make it you could really see a difference on our interior defense, thanks to Haywood.

I can not wait to see tonight for the first time this season we will have everyone back. More L's means more ping pong balls which I am not mad at, however I will take a win against LaTravel anyday over getting extra ping pong balls. I can not stand that team. They feel like the Cowboys to me. Let's go Wiz....

Posted by: BulletsFever | April 2, 2009 9:09 AM | Report abuse

Mr. Lee. I am really liking the way you are doing this blog. No disrespect to Ivan, but you seem to have a more unbiased viewpoint on your reporting then Ivan did.

That game summary you did was great, and I do not think Ivan would have gave Haywood those prop's like you did.

I had drifted away from this blog for about the last month or so because I was getting tired of the same "old stuff". Way to come in making a splash. Keep up the good writing.........

Posted by: BulletsFever | April 2, 2009 9:18 AM | Report abuse

I have not always been a big supporter of Haywood but watching him play defense tonight highlighted how atrocious our defense from the center position has been this year. McGee blocks shots but he refuses to play solid, fundamental defense. Songaila is too small and atheletically challenged to play center. But Haywood was getting people in the proper position, he hedges screen properly by slowing down the guy coming off the screen enough so that his teammate could recover and then he hustled back to his man. Glad to see Haywood return.

Posted by: Chad32 | April 2, 2009 9:27 AM | Report abuse

I second Bullets Forever....this blog is once again a must read.

Posted by: MDBaller1 | April 2, 2009 9:36 AM | Report abuse

That Young/Jamison exchange is a classic -- classic because it is so true on both counts.

Fully agree on the comments about the work you are doing, Michael. Thanks!

If both Gilbert and Haywood play tonight, the Wizards in-game entertainment folks should be fired if they don't play "Reunited (and it feels so good)," hopefully during the last seconds of a win.

Posted by: disgruntledfan | April 2, 2009 10:00 AM | Report abuse

bulletsfever: "...you seem to have a more unbiased viewpoint on your reporting then Ivan did."

Translation: Lee's bias is more like yours.

No criticism, it's just human nature.

Posted by: Samson151 | April 2, 2009 10:06 AM | Report abuse

Mike, more great stuff. We come to this blog for the news, yes, but also for the inside-access that you and maybe one other person, Mike Jones, get. That's the biggest advantage y'all have, the access and knowledge of the locker-room atmosphere, the player's interactions, etc. That's why people come here instead of ESPN,etc for Wizards news.
I love that Young is holding his own against the vets in these back-and-forths, he is fighting for respect from the vets.
And the bit about him replaying the replay eight times, ha

Posted by: emmet1 | April 2, 2009 10:12 AM | Report abuse

You see thats what I been saying all along about Haywood. He got taught through 4-yrs at Carolina Heaven how to play the game.

McGee and others on this Team still have to learn what Haywood was taught in college. A primary reason why Duncan is so good is 4-yrs of college ball from a good University.

You can never underestimate proper training to the success of a player.

Haywood is a Team defensive player and he caught a lot of flak and slow playing time, becuase too many coaches and critics value individual play over Team play.

A crucial mistake. Tim Duncan while clearly more talented than Haywood is also a pure Team player.

Four years of playing college ball in a good system is invaluable.

Thats why whomever gets Tyler Hansbrough is going to be pleasantly surprised with his basketball acumen and play.

No big man out there is more prepared for the NBA right now than Tyler Hansbrough. Blake and others are better players, but none of them is more prepared.

Haywood, Duncan, and other good 4-year players from good colleges should never be judged lightly.

LarryInClintonMD.

Posted by: LarryInClintonMD | April 2, 2009 10:23 AM | Report abuse

I'm a guy who appreciates a lot of what Haywood brings to this team but what's the point if his return in a lost season is going to drop McGee's minutes to less than 5 a game? The Wizards have no plan, no clue how to develop young players and that's pathetic.

Posted by: mugsybol | April 2, 2009 10:41 AM | Report abuse

Michael,

Your piece also indicates that the Wizard players have not been beaten down by this season.

There banter back and forth shows there confidence and surprisingly, there maturity.

Mike, I tell ya' man, the Wizards should really upset some Teams next year. I predict a no less than 4th in the East.

Depending on the coach and the pick, of course.

LarryInClintonMD.

Posted by: LarryInClintonMD | April 2, 2009 10:43 AM | Report abuse

Mugsybol,

I agree with you wholeheatedly. Thats why I posted this last night:

It is imperative that we hire a coach next year that knows how to manage Team play.

The makeup of this Team is easily a serious 8-10 deep. The combinations are versatile and easily interchangeable.

A coach that knows how to meash a 10-deep roster could do wonders with this squad.

The system next year will be crucial to the success of the Wizards. Players like Blatche, Magee, Crit, McGuire, Young would have tremendous impact in the right system.

The right system would also alleviate tremendous pressure on the Vets to carry the Team.

Mr. Abe Polin, Can ya' hire Mark Jackson.

LarryInClintonMD.

Posted by: LarryInClintonMD | April 2, 2009 10:50 AM | Report abuse

Someone explain why in the 75th game for a team that has won 17 games, Butler and Jamisonm play 40 minutes. And they still lose.

You know why McGee has not developed and has basiccally regressed since the 13th game of the Season. Look at the bench, amateur hour. Delude yourself about All Stars, Haywood (who was generally viewed as mediocre before last season), this is the worse run franchise in the league. This season is a micocosm of why this franchise has not been in a Championship series in 30 years.

Posted by: NewManagement | April 2, 2009 11:08 AM | Report abuse

I'm a guy who appreciates a lot of what Haywood brings to this team but what's the point if his return in a lost season is going to drop McGee's minutes to less than 5 a game? The Wizards have no plan, no clue how to develop young players and that's pathetic.

Posted by: mugsybol | April 2, 2009 10:41 AM

I can agree mugsybol to a point. I am also one of the biggest McGee fans out here. What I was ticked about all year long was Tapscott giving away McGee's minutes to the likes of Songalia and Etan Thomas. That is when McGee should have been getting 30 to 35 minutes a game just to learn.

Now with Haywood in the game McGee can clearly get a chance to "learn" the 5 game on the defensive end the right way now. It was doing McGee no good wasting on the bench watching an undersized people (Etan and Song.) play his position, but it is more acceptable and easier to take if it is Haywood taking his minutes.

Also, McGee can actually learn something these last 5 games watching Haywood and listening to him as he calls the defensive sets. Now yes, I believe there are 15 to 20 minutes a good coach could find for McGee with Haywood still getting his 25 per game, but remember this is Tapscott we are talking about.

The bad thing about it is Tapscott is going to give all of those remaining "4" minutes to Song. and plus Tapscott has that stupid rule where he likes either CB or AJ or both on the floor all 48 minutes. That kind of thinking right there takes any remaining minutes McGee might get.

CB back down at the 3 spot now means the only one getting minutes at those two backup "4" and "5" spots other then AJ and CB will be Song. and AB. This hard numbers game my friend now spells 5 future DNP's for Mr. McGee. I don't like it, but it is what it is.......

Posted by: BulletsFever | April 2, 2009 11:19 AM | Report abuse

This season is a micocosm of why this franchise has not been in a Championship series in 30 years.
I disagree slightly but agree in principle. For years, we were too cheap to pay for talent. Now that Abe realizes he can't take it with him, he's paying a lot but still doesn't have the management structure (coaching) in place to reap the benefits. Hiring EG was good. Now if EG can get a decent coach in here, we're in business.

Posted by: original_mark | April 2, 2009 11:25 AM | Report abuse

Good point BulletsFever.

Posted by: LarryInClintonMD | April 2, 2009 11:27 AM | Report abuse

Imagine what this team will look like next year if we get Griffin, can dump Young, Blatche, Pech, Thomas, and James, and pick up a backup shooting guard who can actually shoot.

Posted by: awb9h | April 2, 2009 11:36 AM | Report abuse

The new coverage is much improved! Thanks.

Posted by: tmilt27@aol.com | April 2, 2009 12:05 PM | Report abuse

It would be really nice to see the full cast back tonight. I'm not expecting much the only thing I want to see if them get back into the game and not get injured from anyone and see how the young cast can bring energy from the bench.

Last nights game showed how important Haywood's presence is on the floor. He doesn't make sportscenter with his dunks or blocks but provide a strong anchor in the middle.

Posted by: rcnasa | April 2, 2009 12:07 PM | Report abuse

Ernie has not done a great job with the Wizards. We have guys like Songalia and Etan that are getting way too much $$$ and not producing. Even a healthy Etan was not that good. Why Ernie did not let him go to the Bucks is beyond me. And don't get me started on James or Pech.

Haywood has his problems but one is not effort. This guy comes to play. It is too bad it has not washed over Blatche and Young.

McGuire is not a first team or high second team type of player. He is a nice guy but should only be doing 5-10 minutes per game.

Hopefully we will be able to get Griffin. But knowing our coaches, Griffin will be considered a "project" and get only a few minutes per game.

Posted by: fearturtle44 | April 2, 2009 12:14 PM | Report abuse

"But I don't know if there is another a team that could lose three games in a row and continue to find things to laugh about. Before the Washington Wizards lost 112-107 last night, Nick Young and Dominic McGuire were watching film...."

By Michael Lee | April 2, 2009; 8:35 AM ET

Two things: First, they hadn't lost "3 games in a row" when the locker room stuff you described occurred. Second, it doesn't sound like anyone was laughing--especially considering you later said Jamison got fed up and the issue might have led to some salty attitudes on the court.

This post gets a D-.

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 12:19 PM | Report abuse

I hope to God that we don't end up with Tyler Hansborough. LOL at Larry from Clinton. Are you saying that we should pick Hansborough with the first, second, or third overall pick?

Posted by: G-Man11 | April 2, 2009 12:45 PM | Report abuse

Wes is not the general manager.

Posted by: G-Man11 | April 2, 2009 12:45 PM | Report abuse

McGee should be playing with Haywood. You want him to learn how to play defense? Stick him in there with a guy who's actually intelligently directing him on the defensive end of the court. Common sense.

Posted by: psps23 | April 2, 2009 12:50 PM | Report abuse

Hello!!!!! This is the worst run franchise in the NBA. Well maybe the Knicks! :) This team supposedly has 3 all-stars. You don't miss the playoffs if you have 3 all-stars. The facts are:

1)Jamison has never played defense and is playing and has played on a bad leg for years. The Wizards were not smart in signing him to the big contract he signed this year. It is not valuable if you have 20 and 10 if your counterpart scores 30.

2)Butler has spent too much time this season focused on what the 'young guys' did or didn't do and forgot that if Gilber is out I have to be the best player on the team. He was out of shape this year which leads directly to injuries.

3) The Wizards will need to have the courage to revamp this entire roster if they want to COMPETE. There is no passion and no purpose on this team.

They are unbearable to watch.

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 12:50 PM | Report abuse

This is the worst run franchise in the NBA. Well maybe the Knicks! :) This team supposedly has 3 all-stars. You don't miss the playoffs if you have 3 all-stars.

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 12:50 PM

You're not really this stupid are you? The Wizards have been without their best player for all but 1 game this year. They've been without their starting center for all but 1 game this year. They've been without Butler for a 1/4 of the year. They've been without their starting shooting guard for more than half the season.

Jtrob, your comments were the most asinine I've ever read on the Wizards Insider, and that's really saying something.

Get a clue

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 12:58 PM | Report abuse

How can anyone bad mouth Songila & Pech???

Darius was brought on here to be a 10-15 minutes a game off the bench guy. He is filling in for a starter.
He has as much or more Bball smarts as anyone on the team and plays harder than anyone.

Can Pech play?????
How does anyone know if he can or can't???

If we were battling for a playoff spot OK----BUT---- this is the time to see who might have some game. We know about CB&AJ. What do we know about Pech & McGee?? Look what happened to Mason. we stuffed him on the bench and when he got a chance he showed what he got.
AJ & CB should only get token minutes from now til end of season. Why run them in to the ground for nothing?

Posted by: VBFan | April 2, 2009 1:06 PM | Report abuse

You're not really this stupid are you?

You still did not refute my point. I may be stupid but, I think my point is well taken. No one on this team plays defense. They will have to make a major move if they want to contend. Barely making the playoffs in todays NBA is not success. Next season this is at best a 40 win team fighting for the 7th or 8th playoff spot.

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 1:21 PM | Report abuse

jtrob, 2 things are obvious from your last two posts:

First, you became a wizards fan in the last 5 years.

Second, you don't watch all the Wiz games.

"you don't miss the playoffs if you have 3 all-stars"

Don't come here with that weak sh*t.

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 1:29 PM | Report abuse

Hansbrough sure isn't a top 5 pick, but I agree with Larry's point about his success as a pro. I see Hansbrough being a Battier type player as a pro, but maybe a better rebounder.

I hate all things Duke, but I've got to admit Battier has become one of those "glue guys" in the league. He just plain does all of the dirty work to win a game. McGuire has the makeup to be one of those types of guys if he improves his offense.

Since the salary cap era no NBA team has really committed to playing a tough defense to spring the break style of ball. The primary reason is most teams can't go more then 6 or 8 guys deep and maintain any degree of talent, because their money's all wrapped up in a couple of players.

The ping pong balls bounce right and Grunfeld is able to make a smart trade and the Wiz could go 10 or more deep every night. The Wiz need a coach that would be willing to preach D, and use rebounding and turnovers to push the ball down the court to make easy baskets in transition.

Other then Howard, most of the league's dominant bigs are getting long of tooth. A tough defensive rebounding team that will push the ball in transition could have an opening.
GM
I agree, I like Mike's Posts

Posted by: flohrtv | April 2, 2009 1:40 PM | Report abuse

"you don't miss the playoffs if you have 3 all-stars"

Injury or not name one team in the last decade that missed the playoffs with 3 all stars?

waiting

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 1:43 PM | Report abuse

The Wizards don't have 3 all-stars. None of the players on the team made the all-star team this year.

Posted by: kalo_rama | April 2, 2009 1:46 PM | Report abuse

Kalo I agree with that 100% I'm stating 3 all stars because that is what the team has been selling the fans all year.

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 1:48 PM | Report abuse

"you don't miss the playoffs if you have 3 all-stars"

Injury or not name one team in the last decade that missed the playoffs with 3 all stars?

waiting

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 1:43 PM

Phoenix Suns, this year, dipsh*t.

HAHAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 1:51 PM | Report abuse

G_MAN11,

No I'm not really inferring that we use our top pick on Hansbrough.

However, what I have inferred is if we dont get one of the prime picks, Tyler Hansbrough would be a serious replacement for Etan Thomas and Darius Songaila.

I am with most bloggers looking at Blake Griffin. But I like Tyler as a role player, because I know that he is going to impress in the NBA tremendously more than people think.

My number one concern right now is coaching.

I am all in for MARK JACKSON.

LarryInClintonMD.

Posted by: LarryInClintonMD | April 2, 2009 1:52 PM | Report abuse

I like how jtrob didn't disagree with my assessment that he became a fan in the last 5 years and doesn't watch all the games. I mean, it was painfully obvious from the things he wrote that both those were true...but I just found it funny that he didn't even try to claim otherwise.

Go fairweather on some other team guy, Wiz don't need "fans" like you.

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 1:53 PM | Report abuse

Phoenix Suns, this year, dipsh*t.

HAHAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!

________________________________________

Phoenix only had 2 all stars. wiseguy. Regardless they are still in the hunt. They did not drop to 17 wins. The problem with sports in this town is that Joe fan is willing to give these organizations a pass as if we owe them something.


NO. PLAYER (TEAM) POS. HT. WT. BIRTHDATE FROM
24 * Kobe Bryant (L.A. Lakers) G 6-6 205 08/23/78 Lower Merion HS
3 * Chris Paul (New Orleans) G 6-0 175 05/06/85 Wake Forest
21 * Tim Duncan (San Antonio) F 6-11 260 04/25/76 Wake Forest
1 * Amare Stoudemire (Phoenix) F 6-10 245 11/16/82 Cypress Creek (Orlando, FL)
11 * Yao Ming (Houston) C 7-6 310 9/12/80 China
41 Dirk Nowitzki (Dallas) F 7-0 245 06/19/78 Germany
32 Shaquille O'Neal (Phoenix) C 7-1 325 03/06/72 Louisiana State
7 Brandon Roy (Portland) G 6-6 211 07/23/84 Washington
7 Chauncey Billups (Denver) G 6-3 202 09/25/76 Colorado
16 Pau Gasol (L.A. Lakers) F-C 7-0 250 07/06/80 Spain
30 David West (New Orleans) F 6-9 240 08/29/80 Xavier (OH)
9 Tony Parker (San Antonio) G 6-2 180 05/17/82 France

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 1:58 PM | Report abuse

"The Wizards don't have 3 all-stars. None of the players on the team made the all-star team this year.

Posted by: kalo_rama"

Hey Kalo, you are one tough dude. You don't let up at all. You're right, but you know that we know that you knew what Jtrob_1 meant.

I like reading your blogs 'cause they make me smile in your straight forward serious analogies.

Didn't I tell you to ease up sometime a million' blogs back.

By the way, your coffe choice must be strong and black. Smile Man.

LarryInClintonMD.

Posted by: LarryInClintonMD | April 2, 2009 2:11 PM | Report abuse

Phoenix only had 2 all stars. wiseguy

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 1:58 PM

You're trying to have it both ways. The wizards had zero all stars this year but 3 on the roster from previous years, so that's why you said they have 3 all stars. The Suns have not 1, not 2, not 3, but FOUR all stars on their roster from previous years...and that does not include Jason Richardson, who should have been an all star in 2005 after averaging more than 23 pts a game.

Yet you tried to have it both ways, saying that no team with 3 (former) all stars in the last 10 years has missed the playoffs. Yet the Suns are just the latest example of teams with 3 (former) all stars that have missed the playoffs. In fact, there are several other examples. But we get the point jtrob...you're a fraud, a fairweather, and an idiot to boot.

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 2:20 PM | Report abuse

I like how jtrob didn't disagree with my assessment that he became a fan in the last 5 years and doesn't watch all the games. I mean, it was painfully obvious from the things he wrote that both those were true...but I just found it funny that he didn't even try to claim otherwise.

Go fairweather on some other team guy, Wiz don't need "fans" like you.

-------------------------------------------

Barno-- I have been a fan of the Wiz since before you were born.. I attended games when the Bullets has Bobby D, Wes, and The Big E.... Second I watch all the games that I can stand. When you know the outcome before the game it is a waste of time. Fans like you who are afraid to challenge the organization to be great are the reason why the Wiz have traded away more all stars and NBA champs than any other team in league! wiseguy!

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 2:21 PM | Report abuse

What the Wiz need is accountability! Shaq was not an all star last year. Let's stop being technical. You are trying to justify to yourself why the he** you bought those tickets. Don't get angry with the truth! scrub!

Posted by: jtrob_1 | April 2, 2009 2:25 PM | Report abuse

Jtrob,

You just admitted you don't watch a lot of the Wiz games. If you don't watch the games, what on earth are you doing making comments on here about this team? This blog is for people who actually WATCH the games.

Beat it nerd.

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 2:47 PM | Report abuse

I don't know what sort of conclusions anybody could draw about Brendan Haywood after 24 minutes of ball, but the team did look quite a bit better with him in there.

Same thing that happened when Arenas was in the other night against Detroit.

Of course, that's happened occasionally for every Wiz player this season --even Nick Young.

OK, maybe not Pecherov. But everybody else.

We won't really know much about the Wiz future until after the end of camp next season. There'll be another high draft pick in the mix, and maybe Stevenson will be back, as well.

Wait and see.

Posted by: Samson151 | April 2, 2009 2:51 PM | Report abuse

"But I don't know if there is another a team that could lose three games in a row and continue to find things to laugh about. Before the Washington Wizards lost 112-107 last night, Nick Young and Dominic McGuire were watching film....

By Michael Lee | April 2, 2009; 8:35 AM ET

Two things: First, they hadn't lost "3 games in a row" when the locker room stuff you described occurred. Second, it doesn't sound like anyone was laughing--especially considering you later said Jamison got fed up and the issue might have led to some salty attitudes on the court.

This post gets a D-.
Posted by: Barno1 "

Barno1's reading comprehension: F

Posted by: amalg | April 2, 2009 2:53 PM | Report abuse

amalg, how so? He clearly said he didn't know of any other team that could lose 3 in a row and still find things to laugh about. Then his only example was something that occurred PRIOR to the 3rd lost game in a row. And the one example he pointed to did not include people laughing but actually led to tension. What part of my reading comprehension do you disagree with?

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 2:58 PM | Report abuse

jtrob: You're an idiot.
Barno: Shut up. You're also an idiot.

Posted by: IrenePollin | April 2, 2009 3:10 PM | Report abuse

He said could lose, not did lose, meaning they were at two losses and were facing the possibility of a third.

Then he said might have led to salty attitudes, but the next part of the sentence implied that it did not lead to attitudes and the main point of the blog implies that on some other team, it would lead to salty attitudes.

Posted by: amalg | April 2, 2009 3:35 PM | Report abuse

No one is going to benefit from getting Tyler Hansbrough -- the benefit will be equal to Mark Madsen. Haywood and Duncan are 7-footers and Haywood is still a relatively weak rebounder. But Hansbrough is 6'8, short arms, limited athletically, and thus not likely to have much if any impact in the NBA.

Posted by: Chad32 | April 2, 2009 3:35 PM | Report abuse

News alert:

Nick Young (aka Knucklehead #1) actually played good D last night.

Posted by: Izman | April 2, 2009 4:27 PM | Report abuse

Barno: Shut up. You're also an idiot.

Posted by: IrenePollin | April 2, 2009 3:10 PM

Nah, I'm not an idiot. So, I'm going to keep posting. Thanks though.

Posted by: Barno1 | April 2, 2009 5:09 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company